رسم الكاتب الأمريكي المعروف توماس فريدمان صورة قاتمة لمستقبل إسرائيل تحت حكم رئيس وزراء الاحتلال بنيامين نتنياهو.
وفي مقالة له بصحيفة «نيويورك تايمز»، أكد أن الحرب المستمرة لم تعد دفاعا عن إسرائيل ضد حماس، بل تحوّلت إلى وسيلة لبقاء نتنياهو في السلطة، على حساب أرواح الفلسطينيين، وصورة إسرائيل الدولية، ووحدة المجتمع اليهودي.
ورأى فريدمان أن ما يصفه نتنياهو بـ«الخطأ المأساوي» مثل قصف مستشفى ناصر جنوب غزة ومقتل 20 شخصا بينهم 5 صحفيين، ليست مجرد حوادث عرضية، بل نتيجة حتمية لسياساته الساعية إلى إطالة أمد الحرب للهروب من محاكمته جنائيا وتثبيت تحالفه مع وزراء أقصى اليمين.
ولفت إلى أن وزراء من عينة وزير المالية بتسلئيل سموتريتش، يسعون إلى ملء الضفة الغربية بالمستوطنات لمنع نشوء دولة فلسطينية، ويشجعون على تهجير الفلسطينيين من الضفة وغزة لتمهيد الطريق أمام ضمهما لإسرائيل.
وانتقد فريدمان استخدام إسرائيل جيشها لنقل مئات آلاف الغزيين من منطقة إلى أخرى تحت ذريعة إبعادهم عن مناطق القتال، ثم جرف منازلهم، والتحكم المتعمد في دخول المساعدات الغذائية، مؤكدا أنها سياسات «خبيثة ومخزية» تهدف إلى دفع الناس نحو النزوح القسري.
وحذر من أن هذا النهج يدفع إسرائيل لتصبح دولة منبوذة دوليا، واستشهد بحوادث متفرقة مثل منع أطفال إسرائيليين من دخول متنزه في فرنسا، وخلاف دبلوماسي علني مع أستراليا، ومنع سفينة سياحية إسرائيلية من الرسو في جزيرة يونانية بسبب احتجاجات شعبية.
كل هذه المؤشرات تعكس، في رأيه، حجم التدهور في صورة إسرائيل على مستوى الرأي العام العالمي، «لدرجة أن الإسرائيليين قد يفكرون مرتين قبل التحدث بالعبرية خلال سفرهم إلى الخارج». وأفاد بأن العالم بات يميز بين حرب من أجل بقاء الدولة، وحرب تخوضها حكومة نتنياهو دفاعا عن بقائه السياسي. وأكد أن العالم لم يعد قادرا على غض الطرف، مثلما فعل لأشهر، عن الخسائر المدنية الفلسطينية الهائلة باعتبارها ثمنا لا مفر منه لحرب تهدف -كما كان يُفترض- إلى إخراج حماس من غزة وإحلال قوة عربية بمشاركة السلطة الفلسطينية مكانها.
وفي رأي الكاتب، فإنه بعدما أعلن نتنياهو رفضه أن تُحكم غزة سواء من حماس أو السلطة الفلسطينية، جعل الحرب تبدو بوضوح وكأنها محاولة لمد الاحتلال من الضفة الغربية إلى غزة، وإبقاء إسرائيل بلا شريك فلسطيني على الإطلاق. وأكد أن إسرائيل لم تعد تخسر فقط رصيدها الأخلاقي، بل أيضا حلفاءها الإقليميين والدوليين.
وتوقع الكاتب أن تؤدي الحرب إلى تمزيق وحدة الجاليات اليهودية في الشتات خلال الأعياد القادمة، بين من يرون أن الوقوف مع إسرائيل واجب أبدي، ومن لم يعودوا قادرين على تبرير أفعالها في غزة.
ولفت إلى أن الحزب الديمقراطي الأمريكي يواجه انقساما خطيرا بين جناح يخشى تحدي جماعة الضغط المؤيدة لإسرائيل خوفا من خسارة الدعم المالي، وجناح آخر لم يعد يحتمل السياسات الإسرائيلية التي تجرّ واشنطن إلى مواقف محرجة أمام الرأي العام العالمي.
وأنهى فريدمان مقالته بالتأكيد على أن ما يحدث هو «انتحار جيوسياسي» لن يوقفه سوى تدخل الرئيس دونالد ترمب، إلا أنه يخشى أن يكون ترمب قد وقع بدوره في فخ نتنياهو، وتخلى عن أي تسوية واقعية، مأخوذا بوهم «النصر الكامل» الذي يروّج له نتنياهو.
توماس فريدمان يرسم صورة قاتمة لمستقبل الدولة العبرية
حرب نتنياهو تقود إسرائيل نحو الانتحار
26 أغسطس 2025 - 15:35
|
آخر تحديث 26 أغسطس 2025 - 15:35
قوات الاحتلال في قطاع غزة.
تابع قناة عكاظ على الواتساب
«عكاظ» (جدة) okaz_online@
The well-known American writer Thomas Friedman painted a bleak picture of Israel's future under the rule of the occupying Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
In an article for the "New York Times," he asserted that the ongoing war is no longer a defense of Israel against Hamas, but has turned into a means for Netanyahu to remain in power, at the expense of Palestinian lives, Israel's international image, and the unity of the Jewish community.
Friedman viewed what Netanyahu describes as a "tragic mistake," such as the bombing of Al-Nasser Hospital in southern Gaza and the killing of 20 people, including 5 journalists, as not merely incidental incidents, but a necessary result of his policies aimed at prolonging the war to escape criminal prosecution and solidify his alliance with far-right ministers.
He pointed out that ministers like Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich are seeking to fill the West Bank with settlements to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, and they encourage the displacement of Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza to pave the way for their annexation to Israel.
Friedman criticized Israel's use of its army to move hundreds of thousands of Gazans from one area to another under the pretext of keeping them away from combat zones, then demolishing their homes, and deliberately controlling the entry of food aid, asserting that these are "malicious and disgraceful" policies aimed at forcing people into involuntary displacement.
He warned that this approach is pushing Israel to become an internationally ostracized state, citing scattered incidents such as preventing Israeli children from entering a park in France, a public diplomatic dispute with Australia, and preventing an Israeli cruise ship from docking at a Greek island due to popular protests.
All these indicators reflect, in his opinion, the extent of the deterioration in Israel's image at the level of global public opinion, "to the point that Israelis may think twice before speaking Hebrew while traveling abroad." He reported that the world has begun to distinguish between a war for the survival of the state and a war waged by Netanyahu's government in defense of its political survival. He emphasized that the world can no longer look the other way, as it did for months, regarding the enormous Palestinian civilian casualties as an unavoidable price for a war that was supposed to aim to remove Hamas from Gaza and replace it with an Arab power in partnership with the Palestinian Authority.
In the writer's view, after Netanyahu announced his refusal to allow Gaza to be governed either by Hamas or the Palestinian Authority, the war clearly appeared to be an attempt to extend the occupation from the West Bank to Gaza, leaving Israel without any Palestinian partner at all. He confirmed that Israel is not only losing its moral standing but also its regional and international allies.
The writer predicted that the war would lead to tearing apart the unity of Jewish communities in the diaspora during the upcoming holidays, between those who see standing with Israel as an eternal duty and those who can no longer justify its actions in Gaza.
He noted that the American Democratic Party is facing a serious division between a wing that fears challenging the pro-Israel lobbying group for fear of losing financial support and another wing that can no longer tolerate Israeli policies that drag Washington into embarrassing positions in front of global public opinion.
Friedman concluded his article by asserting that what is happening is "geopolitical suicide" that can only be stopped by the intervention of President Donald Trump, although he fears that Trump may have fallen into Netanyahu's trap and abandoned any realistic settlement, taken in by the illusion of "total victory" that Netanyahu promotes.
In an article for the "New York Times," he asserted that the ongoing war is no longer a defense of Israel against Hamas, but has turned into a means for Netanyahu to remain in power, at the expense of Palestinian lives, Israel's international image, and the unity of the Jewish community.
Friedman viewed what Netanyahu describes as a "tragic mistake," such as the bombing of Al-Nasser Hospital in southern Gaza and the killing of 20 people, including 5 journalists, as not merely incidental incidents, but a necessary result of his policies aimed at prolonging the war to escape criminal prosecution and solidify his alliance with far-right ministers.
He pointed out that ministers like Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich are seeking to fill the West Bank with settlements to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, and they encourage the displacement of Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza to pave the way for their annexation to Israel.
Friedman criticized Israel's use of its army to move hundreds of thousands of Gazans from one area to another under the pretext of keeping them away from combat zones, then demolishing their homes, and deliberately controlling the entry of food aid, asserting that these are "malicious and disgraceful" policies aimed at forcing people into involuntary displacement.
He warned that this approach is pushing Israel to become an internationally ostracized state, citing scattered incidents such as preventing Israeli children from entering a park in France, a public diplomatic dispute with Australia, and preventing an Israeli cruise ship from docking at a Greek island due to popular protests.
All these indicators reflect, in his opinion, the extent of the deterioration in Israel's image at the level of global public opinion, "to the point that Israelis may think twice before speaking Hebrew while traveling abroad." He reported that the world has begun to distinguish between a war for the survival of the state and a war waged by Netanyahu's government in defense of its political survival. He emphasized that the world can no longer look the other way, as it did for months, regarding the enormous Palestinian civilian casualties as an unavoidable price for a war that was supposed to aim to remove Hamas from Gaza and replace it with an Arab power in partnership with the Palestinian Authority.
In the writer's view, after Netanyahu announced his refusal to allow Gaza to be governed either by Hamas or the Palestinian Authority, the war clearly appeared to be an attempt to extend the occupation from the West Bank to Gaza, leaving Israel without any Palestinian partner at all. He confirmed that Israel is not only losing its moral standing but also its regional and international allies.
The writer predicted that the war would lead to tearing apart the unity of Jewish communities in the diaspora during the upcoming holidays, between those who see standing with Israel as an eternal duty and those who can no longer justify its actions in Gaza.
He noted that the American Democratic Party is facing a serious division between a wing that fears challenging the pro-Israel lobbying group for fear of losing financial support and another wing that can no longer tolerate Israeli policies that drag Washington into embarrassing positions in front of global public opinion.
Friedman concluded his article by asserting that what is happening is "geopolitical suicide" that can only be stopped by the intervention of President Donald Trump, although he fears that Trump may have fallen into Netanyahu's trap and abandoned any realistic settlement, taken in by the illusion of "total victory" that Netanyahu promotes.