قبلت المحكمة البريطانية العليا اليوم (الأربعاء) استئناف المؤسسة المشاركة في حركة «فلسطين أكشن» المؤيدة للفلسطينيين، بعد أن رفضت الطعن في قرار حظر الحركة الذي صدر على أساس ارتكابها «أعمالاً إرهابية» منتصف الشهر الجاري.
وفازت مؤسسة الحركة هدى عموري بالدعوى القضائية، لتقديم طعن على قرار الحكومة البريطانية حظر الجماعة بموجب قوانين مكافحة الإرهاب، وذلك بعد أن منحها القاضي مارتن تشامبرلين عموري الإذن بتقديم مراجعة قضائية.
وقال القاضي تشامبرلين: إن قضيتها بأن الحظر يُشكل تدخلاً غير متناسب في حقها، وحق الآخرين في حرية التعبير «جديرة بالنقاش».
وكانت هدى عموري التي ساهمت في تأسيس الحركة عام 2020، قد طلبت من المحكمة العليا في لندن الموافقة على الطعن الكامل في قرار حظر الحركة، الذي صدر على أساس ارتكابها «أعمالاً إرهابية»، أو مشاركتها فيها لكن المحكمة رفضت الطعن بوقف الحظر في وقت سابق من الشهر الجاري وبعد استئناف أخير غير ناجح، رغم أن قرار الحظر لحركة «فلسطين أكشن» دخل حيز التنفيذ بعد منتصف ليل الخامس من يوليو الجاري.
ويُجرم الحظر عضوية الحركة، وتصل عقوبته القصوى إلى السجن 14 عاماً، وعقب تنفيذ الحظر أصدرت الشرطة البريطانية تحذيرات من خطورة تأييد هذه الحركة وقامت باعتقال العشرات من حملة لافتات تؤكد على دعم الحركة ورفض الحظر.
وقال محامو هدى عموري، إن بعض المحتجين الذين عبروا عن دعمهم للقضية الفلسطينية أصبحوا عرضة لتدقيق متزايد من قبل الشرطة.
ودافعت وزيرة الداخلية البريطانية إيفيت كوبر عن قرار الحظر، مؤكدة أن العنف والأضرار الجنائية لا مكان لهما في أي احتجاج مشروع، وأن أنشطة «فلسطين أكشن»، ومن بينها اقتحام قاعدة عسكرية وإلحاق أضرار بطائرتين، تبرر الحظر.
وأعلنت الشرطة البريطانية اعتقال 55 شخصاً خلال مسيرة نظمتها حركة «فلسطين أكشن» المحظورة أمام مبنى البرلمان (السبت).
المحكمة البريطانية تقبل طعن «فلسطين أكشن» في حظرها
30 يوليو 2025 - 18:44
|
آخر تحديث 30 يوليو 2025 - 18:44
احتجاجات فلسطين أكشن في لندن
تابع قناة عكاظ على الواتساب
«عكاظ» (جدة) okaz_online@
The British Supreme Court accepted today (Wednesday) the appeal of the organization involved in the "Palestine Action" movement, which supports Palestinians, after rejecting the challenge against the ban on the movement that was issued based on its alleged involvement in "terrorist acts" earlier this month.
Huda Amouri, the founder of the movement, won the legal case to challenge the British government's decision to ban the group under anti-terrorism laws, after Judge Martin Chamberlain granted her permission to file for a judicial review.
Judge Chamberlain stated that her case, arguing that the ban constitutes a disproportionate interference with her rights and the rights of others to freedom of expression, is "worthy of discussion".
Huda Amouri, who helped establish the movement in 2020, had requested the High Court in London to approve a full appeal against the ban on the movement, which was issued based on its alleged involvement in "terrorist acts" or participation in them. However, the court previously rejected the appeal to suspend the ban earlier this month, and after a recent unsuccessful appeal, despite the ban on "Palestine Action" taking effect after midnight on July 5.
The ban criminalizes membership in the movement, with a maximum penalty of 14 years in prison. Following the implementation of the ban, the British police issued warnings about the dangers of supporting this movement and arrested dozens of protesters carrying signs affirming their support for the movement and rejecting the ban.
Huda Amouri's lawyers stated that some protesters who expressed their support for the Palestinian cause have become subject to increased scrutiny by the police.
British Home Secretary Yvette Cooper defended the ban, asserting that violence and criminal damage have no place in any legitimate protest, and that the activities of "Palestine Action," including storming a military base and damaging two aircraft, justify the ban.
The British police announced the arrest of 55 individuals during a march organized by the banned "Palestine Action" movement outside the Parliament building (on Saturday).
Huda Amouri, the founder of the movement, won the legal case to challenge the British government's decision to ban the group under anti-terrorism laws, after Judge Martin Chamberlain granted her permission to file for a judicial review.
Judge Chamberlain stated that her case, arguing that the ban constitutes a disproportionate interference with her rights and the rights of others to freedom of expression, is "worthy of discussion".
Huda Amouri, who helped establish the movement in 2020, had requested the High Court in London to approve a full appeal against the ban on the movement, which was issued based on its alleged involvement in "terrorist acts" or participation in them. However, the court previously rejected the appeal to suspend the ban earlier this month, and after a recent unsuccessful appeal, despite the ban on "Palestine Action" taking effect after midnight on July 5.
The ban criminalizes membership in the movement, with a maximum penalty of 14 years in prison. Following the implementation of the ban, the British police issued warnings about the dangers of supporting this movement and arrested dozens of protesters carrying signs affirming their support for the movement and rejecting the ban.
Huda Amouri's lawyers stated that some protesters who expressed their support for the Palestinian cause have become subject to increased scrutiny by the police.
British Home Secretary Yvette Cooper defended the ban, asserting that violence and criminal damage have no place in any legitimate protest, and that the activities of "Palestine Action," including storming a military base and damaging two aircraft, justify the ban.
The British police announced the arrest of 55 individuals during a march organized by the banned "Palestine Action" movement outside the Parliament building (on Saturday).