كم كذبة ضد المملكة هذا الشهر؟

Sometimes, the war against countries begins with an old story, an unverified report, and a tweet written in an urgent tone, then it proliferates until it seems like a fact. In the case of Saudi Arabia, psychological warfare is part of the political, security, and economic conflict environment surrounding the Kingdom. Here, a phone, an active account, and an audience ready to believe is all it takes.

September alone provided many examples, as dozens of systematic claims were counted. They emerge from phone screens and are driven by known regional engines. Five prominent cases can be documented that debunked this month; an old clip from Iraq was re-presented as a recent Houthi strike inside the Kingdom, footage of drone attacks in Iraqi Kurdistan was transformed into an attack on King Fahd Air Base in Taif, an old video of a military operation attributed to an Iraqi militia reappeared as an attack on the "East-West" pipeline, then an old industrial fire in Dubai became an attack on Yanbu's oil facilities, and a story about Saudi Arabia purchasing 25 oil tankers for billions of dollars was denied by the Ministry of Energy, which clarified that the rise in shipping costs had other reasons.

These incidents may seem, each one on its own, just small lies. But collectively, they are not small. The problem here lies in their timing, in the audience they target, and in their ability to create an impression before the truth arrives. Therefore, psychological warfare does not need to convince everyone. It is enough to sow doubt among some and to provide others with material to confirm what they already want to believe.

From here, we understand why some anti-Saudi narratives seem resistant to comprehensive correction. The recipient, in general, sometimes looks for what aligns with their previous stance. Thus, we find in the Arab world, and in international circles, those who receive any negative narrative about the Kingdom as confirmation of what they want to believe in advance, turning the rumor into evidence, then a stance, then a campaign. All of this occurs among a misled audience, or one that harbors old grudges, finding in any rumor against Saudi Arabia a release for their political frustrations.

Media campaigns often coincide with political disputes, and different parties may exploit the pressure on the Kingdom when their interests conflict with a Saudi position. The more Riyadh resists aligning with ambiguous projects, or tightens its grip on its sovereign security through strategic partnerships, the more the arsenal of psychological extortion operates in muted violence.

However, the Kingdom has developed greater resilience as a result of decades of skepticism campaigns. They have questioned its policies, its economy, its ability to expand its development, and the cohesion of its society. The tools have varied, but the idea is the same; to create an image of a state that always seems on the brink of crisis. The new aspect is that this production has moved from newsrooms to people's phones. An account with tens of thousands of followers, with no evidence or history, suffices for the purpose.

Here, the algorithm becomes an invisible partner in the battle. The most sensational content spreads faster than the most accurate content. An image suggesting a disaster receives more attention than a statement denying it. As for the correction, it often comes after the story has already traveled halfway.

But there is another aspect to this story. The Kingdom no longer deals with these campaigns in the old way; endlessly chasing every rumor. A state that tries to respond to every lie inadvertently gives the lie additional value. The important thing is to build reliable sources of information, accelerate official communication, support verification tools, and enhance the media's ability to reveal the true context of images and clips. The goal is to make the noise less impactful, not to silence it. This is a fundamental difference; because states do not win the information battle by the quantity of data, but by having an institution that people trust for information when narratives become chaotic.

The Kingdom will remain a target for political and media campaigns. The more its interests expand, the wider the space for its adversaries. The more present it becomes in the region and the world, the more targeting its image becomes part of the conflict. Therefore, rumors will not diminish. One will come tomorrow, followed by another. An old image will appear in a new guise, and a video from another place will be given a Saudi title, and an unknown account will announce an event that never actually happened.