بإعلانها إدانتها واستنكارها الشديدين للاعتداءات الإسرائيلية على الجمهورية الإسلامية الإيرانية، التي اندلعت على نحو مفاجئ فجر الجمعة الماضي، ووصف هذه الاعتداءات بـ«السافرة»، وأنّها «تمثل انتهاكاً ومخالفةً صريحة للقوانين والأعراف الدولية»، داعية المجتمع الدولي ومجلس الأمن لتحمّل مسؤوليته لـ«وقف هذا العدوان بشكل فوري»، تكون المملكة العربية السعودية قد حدّدت المسار الأوفق والأمثل لإمكانية إنهاء هذه الأزمة قبل أن تستفحل وتتمدد، وتغري بعض الأطراف الإقليمية والعالمية بالتدخّل، وفق أجنداتها، وتبعاً لمجريات الأحداث..
وقرنت المملكة موقفها المبدئي هذا بتحركات إقليمية وعالمية واسعة، للتشاور والتباحث مع قادة العالم ومسؤولي الخارجيات فيها لمحاولة بلورة موقف ضاغط يحمل الطرفين على وقف الحرب، والذهاب باتّجاه حلٍّ دبلوماسي يضمن سلامة وأمن المنطقة بشكل عام.. الأمر الذي لا يمكن ضمان نتائجه الإيجابية بغير إرادة دولية نافذة، وخلوص من كافة الأجندات والتحيزات المسبقة، والنّظر إلى الآثار الكارثية التي يمكن أن تسفر عنها هذه الحرب حال استمرارها وتوسع مداها.
إن المنطق العقلاني يفرض علينا تقليب كافة الخيارات الممكنة، والنّظر في المآلات التي يمكن أن تسفر عنها هذه الحرب، وفق المعطيات المنظورة والمشاهدات الماثلة.. فالراجح أن فرص التصعيد العسكري هي الأكثر حضوراً في المشهد، استناداً إلى الهجمات الإسرائيلية المتواصلة وردة الفعل الإيرانية التي تغذيها مشاعر غبن مصدره أولاً الشعور بالخديعة؛ إذ لم يكن من المحتمل- تحت أي ظرف من الظروف- الذهاب إلى خطوة التصعيد العسكري قبل الوقوف على نتائج الجولة الثانية من مباحثات العاصمة العمانية مسقط مع الجانب الأمريكي، التي كان من المقرر أن تنعقد أمس الأحد، ومن الطّبيعي أنها لم تنعقد بعد الذي جرى، فاستباق إسرائيل بالضربة العسكرية لم يكن في الحسبان على الإطلاق.
أما دافع الغبن الآخر، الذي يبدو الأكثر فداحة والأعمق جرحاً فيتمثل في الضربة القاصمة التي طالت المنشآت النووية، واستهداف العلماء القائمين عليها، فضلاً عن مجموعة من قيادات الحرس الثوري، والأمني، بصورة خلّفت وراءها علامات استفهام عريضة، وتساؤلات حرجة، وسيناريوهات مضطربة تحاول فكّ رموز وطلاسم هذا الانحلال الأمني المريب، الذي سمح بضربة موجعة بهذا الحجم، لنظام، عُرف لعهد غير قصير، بقبضته وسطوته الأمنية الحاسمة.. ولعل أقرب هذه السيناريوهات المفسّرة لما حدث يرتبط بخبر حصول إيران على وثائق سرية في صورة ملفات حساسة بصيغة (PDF) وصفتها بـ«الكنز الإستراتيجي»، وطيّها آلاف الوثائق والمعلومات السرية، يتعلق معظمها بالبرنامج النووي الإسرائيلي، ولم يكن ذلك إلا فخّاً إلكترونيّاً أعدّ بحرفية عالية، ومكّن إسرائيل من تحديد أهدافها بشكل دقيق وحاسم، وفي زمن قياسي ومفاجئ.. وهي فرضية أرجّحها، وإن كنت لا أستبعد ما يثار من وجود اختراق أمني من قبل جواسيس في طهران يعملون لصالح تل أبيب.
لكن مهما كانت حرفية هؤلاء الجواسيس، فليس من المرجح أن يوفّروا معلومات بكلّ هذه الدقة، ويمكّنوا إسرائيل من استهداف المشروع النووي والعسكري الإيراني بهذه الدقة المتناهية، فالراجح أن الأمر ينطوي على استخدام عالٍ للتكنولوجيا والذكاء الاصطناعي الذي خُدعت بواسطته إيران..
وعلى أي وجهٍ صحّت الرواية؛ فالخديعة طالت إيران؛ والراجح أنّها الآن في حالة متأرجحة بين الصدمة وحتمية الانتقام الفوري، بما يزيل عنها آلام الضربة الموجعة، وحرج انكشاف غطائها الأمني، وغفلتها الاستخباراتية، والمحصلة ما نشهده من تراشق جوي بالصواريخ على اختلاف مسمياتها وأهدافها وآمادها.
وخطورة هذا الاستهداف الصاروخي أنه في بعض حالاته قد يخرج عن أهدافه العسكرية ليطال المدنية، بما يعني بداهة إعطاء المسوغ لرد مماثل من قبل إسرائيل، وهو ما سيخرج الحرب من أهدافها المركزية، ويذهب بها نحو حرب مفتوحة لا تبقي ولا تذر.
وهنا يمكن خطر خروجها إلى المحيط الإقليمي، الذي سيفضي بلا شك - متى ما تطاول أمد الصراع - إلى حرب عالمية، لا قدر الله.
إن الاستجابة الدولية السريعة لصوت العقل المنطلق من المملكة العربية السعودية، والمساند من كل محبي السلام والأمن، لا شك سيدفع باتجاه الوصول إلى حل يطفئ نار هذه الحرب الكارثية.
وكيفما آلت إليه هذه التحركات وانتهى بها المطاف؛ فالمؤكد أن تغييراً دراماتيكياً سيطال منطقة الشرق الأوسط، بما يتطلّب وعياً جديداً، وقراءة بصيرة للمشهد، تستصحب تقديراً سليماً للمعطيات المتاحة لكلّ دولة، وتوظيف ما تملك لخدمة مصالح الشعوب ورفاهيتها، بعيداً عن تيارات التجاذب الآيديولوجي والشعارات الديماجوجية العصابية، ومحاربة طواحين الهواء.
نجيب يماني
المملكة.. موقف مبدئي وتحركات حكيمة
16 يونيو 2025 - 00:00
|
آخر تحديث 16 يونيو 2025 - 00:00
تابع قناة عكاظ على الواتساب
By announcing its strong condemnation and denunciation of the Israeli attacks on the Islamic Republic of Iran, which erupted unexpectedly in the early hours of last Friday, and describing these attacks as "brazen," and that they "represent a clear violation of international laws and norms," calling on the international community and the Security Council to take responsibility to "immediately stop this aggression," the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has set the most appropriate and optimal course for the possibility of ending this crisis before it escalates and expands, enticing some regional and global parties to intervene according to their agendas, depending on the developments of events...
Saudi Arabia has linked its principled stance to extensive regional and global movements, to consult and discuss with world leaders and foreign officials in an attempt to formulate a pressuring position that compels both parties to stop the war and move towards a diplomatic solution that ensures the safety and security of the region in general. This cannot guarantee positive outcomes without effective international will, free from all agendas and prior biases, and considering the catastrophic effects that this war could result in if it continues and expands.
The rational logic compels us to explore all possible options and consider the outcomes that this war could produce, based on the observable data and current observations. The likelihood of military escalation is most present in the scene, based on the ongoing Israeli attacks and the Iranian reaction fueled by feelings of grievance stemming primarily from a sense of deception; as it was not possible—under any circumstances—to proceed to a step of military escalation before assessing the results of the second round of talks in the Omani capital Muscat with the American side, which was scheduled to take place yesterday, Sunday, and naturally, it did not occur after what transpired. Israel's preemptive military strike was not anticipated at all.
As for the other grievance motive, which seems to be the most severe and deeply wounding, it is represented in the devastating strike that targeted the nuclear facilities and aimed at the scientists overseeing them, in addition to a group of leaders from the Revolutionary Guard and security forces, leaving behind broad question marks, critical inquiries, and troubled scenarios trying to decipher the codes and mysteries of this troubling security breakdown, which allowed for such a painful strike against a regime known for its decisive grip and security dominance for a considerable period. Perhaps the closest of these explanatory scenarios for what happened is related to the news of Iran obtaining secret documents in the form of sensitive files in (PDF) format, which it described as a "strategic treasure," containing thousands of confidential documents and information, most of which pertains to the Israeli nuclear program. This was nothing but a highly professional electronic trap, enabling Israel to precisely and decisively identify its targets in a record and surprising time... This is a hypothesis I lean towards, although I do not rule out the speculation about the existence of a security breach by spies in Tehran working for Tel Aviv.
However, no matter how skilled these spies are, it is unlikely that they would provide information with such precision, enabling Israel to target the Iranian nuclear and military project with such extreme accuracy. It is more likely that this involves a high use of technology and artificial intelligence that deceived Iran...
Regardless of how accurate the narrative is; the deception has affected Iran; and it is likely that it is now in a state of oscillation between shock and the necessity for immediate revenge, to alleviate the pain of the painful strike, the embarrassment of its security cover being exposed, and its intelligence negligence. The result is what we are witnessing of aerial exchanges with missiles of various names, targets, and ranges.
The danger of this missile targeting is that in some cases it may stray from its military objectives to hit civilian ones, which inherently means providing justification for a similar response from Israel, which will shift the war away from its central objectives and lead it towards an open war that spares nothing.
Here lies the danger of its expansion into the regional arena, which will undoubtedly lead—whenever the duration of the conflict prolongs—to a global war, God forbid.
The swift international response to the voice of reason emanating from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, supported by all lovers of peace and security, will undoubtedly push towards reaching a solution that extinguishes the flames of this catastrophic war.
Regardless of how these movements unfold and where they ultimately lead; it is certain that a dramatic change will affect the Middle East, requiring a new awareness and a keen reading of the scene, accompanied by a sound assessment of the available data for each country, and utilizing what they possess to serve the interests and welfare of the peoples, away from the currents of ideological tug-of-war and demagogic slogans, and fighting windmills.
Saudi Arabia has linked its principled stance to extensive regional and global movements, to consult and discuss with world leaders and foreign officials in an attempt to formulate a pressuring position that compels both parties to stop the war and move towards a diplomatic solution that ensures the safety and security of the region in general. This cannot guarantee positive outcomes without effective international will, free from all agendas and prior biases, and considering the catastrophic effects that this war could result in if it continues and expands.
The rational logic compels us to explore all possible options and consider the outcomes that this war could produce, based on the observable data and current observations. The likelihood of military escalation is most present in the scene, based on the ongoing Israeli attacks and the Iranian reaction fueled by feelings of grievance stemming primarily from a sense of deception; as it was not possible—under any circumstances—to proceed to a step of military escalation before assessing the results of the second round of talks in the Omani capital Muscat with the American side, which was scheduled to take place yesterday, Sunday, and naturally, it did not occur after what transpired. Israel's preemptive military strike was not anticipated at all.
As for the other grievance motive, which seems to be the most severe and deeply wounding, it is represented in the devastating strike that targeted the nuclear facilities and aimed at the scientists overseeing them, in addition to a group of leaders from the Revolutionary Guard and security forces, leaving behind broad question marks, critical inquiries, and troubled scenarios trying to decipher the codes and mysteries of this troubling security breakdown, which allowed for such a painful strike against a regime known for its decisive grip and security dominance for a considerable period. Perhaps the closest of these explanatory scenarios for what happened is related to the news of Iran obtaining secret documents in the form of sensitive files in (PDF) format, which it described as a "strategic treasure," containing thousands of confidential documents and information, most of which pertains to the Israeli nuclear program. This was nothing but a highly professional electronic trap, enabling Israel to precisely and decisively identify its targets in a record and surprising time... This is a hypothesis I lean towards, although I do not rule out the speculation about the existence of a security breach by spies in Tehran working for Tel Aviv.
However, no matter how skilled these spies are, it is unlikely that they would provide information with such precision, enabling Israel to target the Iranian nuclear and military project with such extreme accuracy. It is more likely that this involves a high use of technology and artificial intelligence that deceived Iran...
Regardless of how accurate the narrative is; the deception has affected Iran; and it is likely that it is now in a state of oscillation between shock and the necessity for immediate revenge, to alleviate the pain of the painful strike, the embarrassment of its security cover being exposed, and its intelligence negligence. The result is what we are witnessing of aerial exchanges with missiles of various names, targets, and ranges.
The danger of this missile targeting is that in some cases it may stray from its military objectives to hit civilian ones, which inherently means providing justification for a similar response from Israel, which will shift the war away from its central objectives and lead it towards an open war that spares nothing.
Here lies the danger of its expansion into the regional arena, which will undoubtedly lead—whenever the duration of the conflict prolongs—to a global war, God forbid.
The swift international response to the voice of reason emanating from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, supported by all lovers of peace and security, will undoubtedly push towards reaching a solution that extinguishes the flames of this catastrophic war.
Regardless of how these movements unfold and where they ultimately lead; it is certain that a dramatic change will affect the Middle East, requiring a new awareness and a keen reading of the scene, accompanied by a sound assessment of the available data for each country, and utilizing what they possess to serve the interests and welfare of the peoples, away from the currents of ideological tug-of-war and demagogic slogans, and fighting windmills.


