تخرجت دانية من جامعة سعودية مرموقة في تخصص اللغة الإنجليزية. وعندما دخلت إلى غرفة المقابلة الشخصية لدى شركة كبرى، تكوّن في ذهن مدير إدارة الترجمة وبعض أعضاء لجنة التوظيف، منذ اللحظة الأولى، أنها لا تبدو كشخصية قيادية. بعد أقل من خمس دقائق من المقابلة، حُسم قرار الرفض. وفي أقل من أربعة عشر شهراً من هذه المقابلة، أصبحت دانية رئيسة قسم الترجمة في شركة رائدة منافسة وحققت نجاحاً في قسمها واستطاعت قيادة موظفيها بكفاءة. فهل كان قرار رفض مدير إدارة الترجمة في الشركة الكبرى صحيحاً في نظرك؟
ربما يتبادر إلى ذهنك أن الإجابة هي أن قرار الرفض كان خاطئاً ومتسرعاً، لأنك علمت بعدها أنها أصبحت رئيسة قسم الترجمة في شركة رائدة منافسة وحققت نجاحاً، فهي بذلك شخصية قيادية. لكن دعونا نعود قليلاً إلى لحظة المقابلة الشخصية الأولى. وتخيّل أنك مدير/ة إدارة الترجمة، وتقدّمت إليك مواطنة حديثة التخرج، تمتلك الحماس وحب التعلّم والاستعداد للتطوير، وغالباً لا تمتلك الخبرة الكافية في طبيعة العمل ولا الممارسة الجيدة في المقابلات الوظيفية. هنا، فمن غير المنطقي تقييم مهاراتها القيادية، أو إصدار حكم نهائي بشأنها من مقابلة شخصية واحدة فقط. إذاً، لماذا يُطلق بعض المديرين أحكاماً على الآخرين بسرعة؟
فسّر الدكتور ألكسندر تودوروف (Alexander Todorov) الأستاذ المعروف في علم الإدراك الاجتماعي، أن كثيراً من الناس يُكوّنون أحكاماً (انطباعاً) على الآخرين من خلال اللقاء الأول، وذلك في أقل من 30 ثانية. ربما تُثير هذه الحقيقة العلمية الفاجعة وغير العادلة -عزيزي القارئ أختي القارئة- بعض التساؤلات، أهمها: ما خطورة الحكم المسبق على الآخرين من خلال اللقاء الأول؟
نوضح أن إصدار الأحكام على الآخرين الذي يتكوّن بسرعة خاطفة، هو سلوك بشري طبيعي، نشأ في معظمنا منذ الصِغر، واعتقدناه خطأ أنه صحيح، أو أننا نمتلك قدرة خارقة على الحكم على الآخرين بمجرد النظرة. الأمر الآخر، أن إصدار الأحكام لا يحتاج إلى بذل جهد ذهني كبير أو عمق عقلي في التفكير، بل يعتمد فقط على بعض المعلومات السطحية المخزنة في عقولنا، وبعض الاستنتاجات الظاهرة أمامنا. أما بالنسبة لخطورة إصدار أحكام مسبقة على الآخرين بناءً على الانطباع الأول في بيئات العمل، فهي أولاً: تُؤثر سلباً على صحة القرارات. ومن أبرز تلك القرارات: قرارات التوظيف، والترقية، والمحاكمات. هذا الأمر قد يُعيق المدير عن اتخاذ قرارات موضوعية أو حتى صحيحة. ثانياً: تُعطل فرص التواصل مع الطرف الآخر وبناء الثقة معه، فعندما تصدر أحكام على شخص ما في أول لقاء بناءً على مظهره أو طريقة حديثه، فقد تم تجاهل جوانب أخرى فيه كالرغبة في التعلم والتطوير والتمسك بالقيم والسلوكيات الإيجابية والذكاء العاطفي والاجتماعي، وكل هذه من أهم الصفات.
تلخيصاً لما سبق، فإن الحكم السريع على الآخرين من خلال المقابلة الشخصية فقط، قد يُقصي أشخاصاً مناسبين جداً لمنظماتنا. ورغم أنه من سلوكنا البشري الطبيعي، وأننا نحكم على الآخرين بمجرد النظرة، وأننا لا نريد أن نبذل جهداً كبيراً في تحليل الطرف الآخر قبل الحكم عليه، فإن علينا ضبط هذا السلوك لأنه يؤثر سلباً على قراراتنا ولا يجعلنا نبني ثقة مع الآخرين. أخيراً، الاستعجال في الحكم قد يُضيّع على وطننا قادة فعّالين؛ فلنمنح للكفاءات الوطنية أن تُظهر نفسها.
سامي الدجوي
قرارات عمياء تُقصي الكفاءات الوطنية
25 يوليو 2025 - 00:05
|
آخر تحديث 25 يوليو 2025 - 00:05
تابع قناة عكاظ على الواتساب
Dania graduated from a prestigious Saudi university with a degree in English language. When she entered the interview room at a major company, the head of the translation department and some members of the hiring committee formed the impression from the very first moment that she did not seem like a leadership personality. Less than five minutes into the interview, the decision to reject her was made. In less than fourteen months from that interview, Dania became the head of the translation department at a competing leading company and achieved success in her department, managing her employees effectively. So, do you think the rejection decision made by the head of the translation department at the major company was correct?
Perhaps you might think that the answer is that the rejection decision was wrong and hasty, because you later learned that she became the head of the translation department at a competing leading company and achieved success, thus she is a leadership personality. But let’s go back a bit to the moment of the first interview. Imagine that you are the head of the translation department, and a recent graduate citizen comes to you, full of enthusiasm, a love for learning, and a readiness for development, but likely lacks sufficient experience in the nature of the work and good practice in job interviews. Here, it is unreasonable to evaluate her leadership skills or to make a final judgment about her based on just one interview. So, why do some managers make quick judgments about others?
Dr. Alexander Todorov, a well-known professor in social perception, explained that many people form judgments (impressions) about others during the first meeting, and this happens in less than 30 seconds. This shocking and unfair scientific fact—dear reader—might raise some questions, the most important of which is: What is the danger of making preconceived judgments about others based on the first meeting?
We clarify that making quick judgments about others is a natural human behavior that has developed in most of us since childhood, and we mistakenly believed it to be correct, or that we possess a superhuman ability to judge others at first glance. Another point is that making judgments does not require significant mental effort or deep thinking; it only relies on some superficial information stored in our minds and some apparent conclusions in front of us. As for the danger of making preconceived judgments about others based on first impressions in work environments, it primarily: negatively affects the validity of decisions. Among the most notable of these decisions are hiring, promotion, and trials. This can hinder the manager from making objective or even correct decisions. Secondly, it disrupts opportunities for communication with the other party and building trust with them. When judgments are made about someone in the first meeting based on their appearance or way of speaking, other aspects of them, such as the desire for learning and development, adherence to values and positive behaviors, and emotional and social intelligence, are overlooked, all of which are among the most important qualities.
In summary, making quick judgments about others based solely on the interview may exclude very suitable individuals for our organizations. And although it is part of our natural human behavior, that we judge others at first glance, and that we do not want to exert much effort in analyzing the other party before judging them, we must regulate this behavior because it negatively affects our decisions and prevents us from building trust with others. Finally, rushing to judgment may deprive our country of effective leaders; let us allow national talents to show themselves.
Perhaps you might think that the answer is that the rejection decision was wrong and hasty, because you later learned that she became the head of the translation department at a competing leading company and achieved success, thus she is a leadership personality. But let’s go back a bit to the moment of the first interview. Imagine that you are the head of the translation department, and a recent graduate citizen comes to you, full of enthusiasm, a love for learning, and a readiness for development, but likely lacks sufficient experience in the nature of the work and good practice in job interviews. Here, it is unreasonable to evaluate her leadership skills or to make a final judgment about her based on just one interview. So, why do some managers make quick judgments about others?
Dr. Alexander Todorov, a well-known professor in social perception, explained that many people form judgments (impressions) about others during the first meeting, and this happens in less than 30 seconds. This shocking and unfair scientific fact—dear reader—might raise some questions, the most important of which is: What is the danger of making preconceived judgments about others based on the first meeting?
We clarify that making quick judgments about others is a natural human behavior that has developed in most of us since childhood, and we mistakenly believed it to be correct, or that we possess a superhuman ability to judge others at first glance. Another point is that making judgments does not require significant mental effort or deep thinking; it only relies on some superficial information stored in our minds and some apparent conclusions in front of us. As for the danger of making preconceived judgments about others based on first impressions in work environments, it primarily: negatively affects the validity of decisions. Among the most notable of these decisions are hiring, promotion, and trials. This can hinder the manager from making objective or even correct decisions. Secondly, it disrupts opportunities for communication with the other party and building trust with them. When judgments are made about someone in the first meeting based on their appearance or way of speaking, other aspects of them, such as the desire for learning and development, adherence to values and positive behaviors, and emotional and social intelligence, are overlooked, all of which are among the most important qualities.
In summary, making quick judgments about others based solely on the interview may exclude very suitable individuals for our organizations. And although it is part of our natural human behavior, that we judge others at first glance, and that we do not want to exert much effort in analyzing the other party before judging them, we must regulate this behavior because it negatively affects our decisions and prevents us from building trust with others. Finally, rushing to judgment may deprive our country of effective leaders; let us allow national talents to show themselves.


