يكون العقل الإنساني في سنواته الأولى بالغ القابلية للتشكّل، إذ يشبه أرضاً خصبة تُنبت فيها أنماط التفكير والانفعال.
وهذا التشكّل لا يتم في عزلة، بل يتكوّن من تداخلٍ دقيق بين العوامل الوراثية والاستعدادات الفطرية من جهة، والتأثيرات البيئية والتعلّم الاجتماعي من جهة أخرى، حيث يكتسب الطفل سلوكياته وخبراته من خلال الملاحظة والتقليد.
ومع ذلك، لا يتفاعل جميع الأطفال بالطريقة نفسها، فالفروق الفردية كالمزاج والسمات الوراثية تُحدد مسارات التلقي والاستجابة، وتمنح لكل عقل طابعه الخاص.
وتُعد الأفكار الموروثة، تلك التي تنتقل من جيل إلى آخر دون مساءلة أو مراجعة، من أقوى العوامل في تشكيل البنية النفسية للفرد.
ورغم أنها لا تكون سلبية في جوهرها، إلا أن توظيفها في التلاعب النفسي وتغذية الحقد أو تبرير التعصّب يحوّلها إلى قيود ذهنية تقيّد نمو الوعي. فالخطورة لا تكمن في الفكرة ذاتها، بل في الطريقة التي تُلقَّن بها، وفي الأثر الانفعالي والسلوكي الذي تُعيد إنتاجه.
ومن منظور علم النفس العصبي، فإن تكرار أنماط التفكير السلبي يُرسّخها في البنية العصبية، لتتحوّل إلى استجابات تلقائية يكرّرها الفرد دون وعي، فيغدو أسيرًا لانفعالات لم يخترها، بل تشرّبها بفعل البيئة والظروف المحيطة.
وهنا تظهر أهمية الربط بين تكوين العقل وسياق العصر، حيث تلعب وسائل الإعلام، والخطاب الديني، والتعليم دوراً حاسماً في غرس البنية الثقافية وتشكيل علاقة الفرد بموروثه، سواء عبر تعزيز الفهم الواعي أو ترسيخ التلقائية غير المدروسة.
تتجلّى قيمة التنظيم الانفعالي في قدرة الفرد على فهم انفعالاته والتعامل معها بوعي لا كقوى قاهرة. فالحرية العقلية لا تتحقق بنبذ التراث، بل بإعادة النظر فيه وتأمله بوعي ناقد، يراعي متغيرات الزمن، ويحدد ما يُستبقى وما يُتجاوز.
يصبح قادراً على العبور من أسر الانفعالات الموروثة إلى رحابة الوعي الحر، ومن التفاعل الواعي مع الموروث إلى سيادة الذات المفكّرة.
تابع قناة عكاظ على الواتساب
أشواق شتيوي
ASHWAG_SHETEWI@
The human mind in its early years is highly malleable, resembling fertile land where patterns of thought and emotion sprout.
This formation does not occur in isolation; rather, it results from a delicate interplay between genetic factors and innate predispositions on one hand, and environmental influences and social learning on the other, as the child acquires behaviors and experiences through observation and imitation.
However, not all children react in the same way; individual differences such as temperament and genetic traits determine the pathways of reception and response, granting each mind its unique character.
Inherited ideas, those that are passed down from one generation to another without questioning or review, are among the strongest factors in shaping an individual's psychological structure.
Although they are not inherently negative, their use in psychological manipulation, fostering hatred, or justifying bigotry transforms them into mental constraints that hinder the growth of awareness. The danger lies not in the idea itself, but in the way it is imparted and in the emotional and behavioral impact it reproduces.
From a neuropsychological perspective, the repetition of negative thought patterns solidifies them in the neural structure, turning them into automatic responses that the individual repeats unconsciously, becoming a prisoner of emotions they did not choose but absorbed due to their environment and surrounding circumstances.
Here, the importance of linking the formation of the mind with the context of the era becomes evident, as media, religious discourse, and education play a crucial role in instilling cultural structures and shaping an individual's relationship with their heritage, whether through enhancing conscious understanding or reinforcing unexamined automaticity.
The value of emotional regulation is manifested in the individual's ability to understand their emotions and deal with them consciously, rather than as overpowering forces. Mental freedom is not achieved by rejecting heritage, but by reconsidering it and reflecting on it with a critical awareness that takes into account the changes of time, determining what should be retained and what should be transcended.
One becomes capable of moving from the captivity of inherited emotions to the expansiveness of free awareness, and from conscious interaction with heritage to the dominance of a thinking self.
This formation does not occur in isolation; rather, it results from a delicate interplay between genetic factors and innate predispositions on one hand, and environmental influences and social learning on the other, as the child acquires behaviors and experiences through observation and imitation.
However, not all children react in the same way; individual differences such as temperament and genetic traits determine the pathways of reception and response, granting each mind its unique character.
Inherited ideas, those that are passed down from one generation to another without questioning or review, are among the strongest factors in shaping an individual's psychological structure.
Although they are not inherently negative, their use in psychological manipulation, fostering hatred, or justifying bigotry transforms them into mental constraints that hinder the growth of awareness. The danger lies not in the idea itself, but in the way it is imparted and in the emotional and behavioral impact it reproduces.
From a neuropsychological perspective, the repetition of negative thought patterns solidifies them in the neural structure, turning them into automatic responses that the individual repeats unconsciously, becoming a prisoner of emotions they did not choose but absorbed due to their environment and surrounding circumstances.
Here, the importance of linking the formation of the mind with the context of the era becomes evident, as media, religious discourse, and education play a crucial role in instilling cultural structures and shaping an individual's relationship with their heritage, whether through enhancing conscious understanding or reinforcing unexamined automaticity.
The value of emotional regulation is manifested in the individual's ability to understand their emotions and deal with them consciously, rather than as overpowering forces. Mental freedom is not achieved by rejecting heritage, but by reconsidering it and reflecting on it with a critical awareness that takes into account the changes of time, determining what should be retained and what should be transcended.
One becomes capable of moving from the captivity of inherited emotions to the expansiveness of free awareness, and from conscious interaction with heritage to the dominance of a thinking self.


