شطب الاتحاد !

When a historian or contemporary mentions information, we must deal with it based on the data of denial, confirmation, or correction for the benefit of all. If we take it out of context, the dialogue is corrupted and turns into a debate that leads us to noise, and amidst the raised voices, the truth disappears.

For fifty years, and perhaps more, the battle for the deanship between Al-Ittihad and Al-Wahda continues to be discussed and passed down without us reaching a solution that satisfies both parties.

Historian Mohammed Al-Qaddadi recently raised the issue of the cancellation of Al-Ittihad and presented audio and visual evidence. The people reacted, with some supporting what Al-Qaddadi mentioned and others rejecting it, and the voice of truth that we were waiting for to know the details of that cancellation was absent.

Since I do not possess documents to engage in this battle, I preferred silence and observation so that I would not hear someone say, "What do you understand about history?"

However, it seems to me through this dialogue that I am convinced that there was indeed a cancellation of Al-Ittihad, but the disagreement lies in the method of handling it, which Al-Qaddadi stated that the president of Al-Wahda at the time was the one who intervened for Al-Ittihad to lift the decision.

Al-Qaddadi presented an image of the decision that was circulated on X, and he referenced a news article published at that time in the Arafat newspaper.

Here, colleague Othman Mali denies the intervention of the president of Al-Wahda and confirms the reversal of the cancellation decision by saying: "It is not true at all that there was any intervention."

Indeed, Uncle Azhar was the president of Al-Wahda, and by the way (information), he was also an honorary member of Al-Ittihad.

The decision was reversed after an apology from Al-Ittihad.

Through my tracking of the responses to historian Mohammed Al-Qaddadi, there is a consensus on the cancellation and a disagreement on the method of reversing the decision.

Al-Qaddadi says it was an intervention from Al-Wahda, while colleague Othman Mali says the reversal came after an apology from Al-Ittihad.

#Question

How does Al-Ahli request an honorary passage while Asia, in two versions, was a passage for it and others watch, defeated and broken in spirit?

Honor is for you if you did it, not for Al-Ahli.

Flash

By God, we do not know whether we love people or despise them?

We can no longer bear some people.

If you give people your face, they say you are light-headed.

If you exceed the limits, they say, "What arrogance is this!"