التعصب: ودي أخذكم في عصف ذهني نبحث من خلاله عن تعريف دقيق للتعصب ولكن أخاف أن لا نصل إلى المعنى الحقيقي للتعصب.
حاولنا ذات حوار أن نجد تعريفا متفقا عليه للتعصب وانتهى المحور قبل أن نتفق، ولهذا من الأفضل يظل مصطلحا يرمز للغلو والمغالاة وإن لم يعجبكم فهات ما عندكم علناً نقنع به الزميل عدنان جستنية أن له معنى وليس مجرد مصطلح فضفاض.
الأهلي: لا أعلم حصل على رئيس الأربعين مليونا أم مازال البحث جارياً، أما أنا فقرأت العنوان واكتفيت أمامه بهذه التغريدة، جميل أن توضع لوائح من أجل الأندية ومستقبل الأندية، سؤالي عن الأربعة ومن يرأس الأربعة، هل كل الثلاثة: «هلال، ونصر، واتحاد» دفعوا الأربعين مليونا من أجل رئاسة الشركة؟.
ربما.... لكن لماذا فقط الأهلي الذي أعلن إعلامياً وخير خالد الغامدي بين دفع الأربعين مليونا أو سيرشح غيره وهل غيره توافقي أم سيدفع الأربعين؟
افعلوا مثل كل الثلاثة استعينوا على حل أموركم بالكتمان، فنحن مع اللوائح، ولكن ضد الخلافات والانقسامات.
رسالة: عن العلاقات مع الآخرين قال تولستوي:
عشت من أجل الآخرين، فحطمت حياتي كلها نهائياً. إنني منذ أن بدأت العيش من أجل نفسي شعرت، على العكس، بأعظم قسط من الراحة والهدوء.
وقال كافكا: «في علاقتي مع الآخرين جزء طفيف مني يتوسل المواصلة، جزء هائل مني يرغب في الهروب».
وأنت يا محمد العميري وش تقول؟
قانون: عندما شُطب لاعب هلالي ثم عُفي عنه قلتُ: يعود للهلال ليكمل عقده من حيث توقف ولا يجوز انتقاله لناد آخر قبل ذلك..
لكن ما يقوله هلاليون حاليًا من وجوب عودة #سعود_عبدالحميد لناديهم لا سند قانونيا له، فعقده مع الهلال انتهى بانتقاله..
التوقيع: محمد الدويش
تابع قناة عكاظ على الواتساب
Intolerance: I would like to take you through a brainstorming session where we search for an accurate definition of intolerance, but I fear we may not reach the true meaning of the term.
In a previous discussion, we tried to find a mutually agreed definition of intolerance, and the discussion ended before we could reach an agreement. Therefore, it is better to keep it as a term that symbolizes extremism and exaggeration. If you don’t like that, then present your views openly so we can convince our colleague Adnan Jastania that it has meaning and is not just a vague term.
Al-Ahli: I don’t know if he has received the forty million or if the search is still ongoing. As for me, I read the headline and settled for this tweet. It’s nice to have regulations for clubs and their future. My question is about the four and who leads the four. Did all three: “Hilal, Nasr, and Ittihad” pay the forty million for the presidency of the company?
Perhaps... but why is it only Al-Ahli that publicly announced and gave Khalid Al-Ghamdi the choice between paying the forty million or nominating someone else? Is the alternative someone who is agreeable or will they pay the forty million?
Do like the other three and keep your matters discreet. We are in favor of regulations but against disputes and divisions.
Message: Regarding relationships with others, Tolstoy said:
I lived for others, and I completely shattered my life. Since I began living for myself, I have felt, on the contrary, the greatest degree of comfort and tranquility.
Kafka said: “In my relationship with others, a small part of me begs for continuity, while a huge part of me wishes to escape.”
And you, Mohamed Al-Omairi, what do you say?
Law: When a Hilali player was suspended and then pardoned, I said: he returns to Al-Hilal to complete his contract from where he left off, and he cannot transfer to another club before that...
But what the Hilalis are currently saying about the necessity of #Saud_Abdulhamid returning to their club has no legal basis; his contract with Al-Hilal ended with his transfer...
Signature: Mohamed Al-Dweesh
In a previous discussion, we tried to find a mutually agreed definition of intolerance, and the discussion ended before we could reach an agreement. Therefore, it is better to keep it as a term that symbolizes extremism and exaggeration. If you don’t like that, then present your views openly so we can convince our colleague Adnan Jastania that it has meaning and is not just a vague term.
Al-Ahli: I don’t know if he has received the forty million or if the search is still ongoing. As for me, I read the headline and settled for this tweet. It’s nice to have regulations for clubs and their future. My question is about the four and who leads the four. Did all three: “Hilal, Nasr, and Ittihad” pay the forty million for the presidency of the company?
Perhaps... but why is it only Al-Ahli that publicly announced and gave Khalid Al-Ghamdi the choice between paying the forty million or nominating someone else? Is the alternative someone who is agreeable or will they pay the forty million?
Do like the other three and keep your matters discreet. We are in favor of regulations but against disputes and divisions.
Message: Regarding relationships with others, Tolstoy said:
I lived for others, and I completely shattered my life. Since I began living for myself, I have felt, on the contrary, the greatest degree of comfort and tranquility.
Kafka said: “In my relationship with others, a small part of me begs for continuity, while a huge part of me wishes to escape.”
And you, Mohamed Al-Omairi, what do you say?
Law: When a Hilali player was suspended and then pardoned, I said: he returns to Al-Hilal to complete his contract from where he left off, and he cannot transfer to another club before that...
But what the Hilalis are currently saying about the necessity of #Saud_Abdulhamid returning to their club has no legal basis; his contract with Al-Hilal ended with his transfer...
Signature: Mohamed Al-Dweesh
