أعلن فهد بن نافل استقالته من رئاسة نادي الهلال واضعاً بذلك نقطة نهاية لمسيرة إدارية استثنائية قاد خلالها الزعيم لتحقيق إنجازات ضخمة محلياً وآسيوياً.
لكن الغريب أن هذه الاستقالة لم تُقابل بالحفاوة أو حتى بالإنصاف، بل كشفت شيئاً أكبر من مجرد خروج إداري كشفت جمهوراً لا يعرف ما يريد.
من «ارحل» إلى «رجعوه».. هذه مؤامرة منطق جماهيري مختل
المشهد كان فاضحاً ليس لفهد بن نافل بل لمن كانوا يصيحون بالأمس مطالبين برحيله دون سبب!!
الجمهور الذي هتف مطالباً بالاستقالة انقلب يبكي على خروجه ويصرخ «مؤامرة».. أي جمهور هذا الذي لا يصمد على موقف ثابت من أجل ترند جاهل!!
الاستقالة لم تكن مفاجئة بل نتيجة حملة إسقاط
استقالة فهد لم تكن رد فعل عاطفي بل نتيجة حملة منظمة من التشكيك والتحريض طالت سمعته الرياضية وقراراته وتجاوزت في كثير من الأحيان حدود النقد الرياضي إلى الإساءة الشخصية،
حتى إن بعض خصومه من خارج البيت الهلالي انتقدوا تلك الحملة لما يعرفونه من كفاءة الرجل وحكمته.
إنجازات لا تُغفر
في عهد فهد بن نافل حصد الهلال كل شيء تقريباً..
بطولات محلية متتالية..
لقب دوري أبطال آسيا..
مشاركة في كأس العالم للأندية..
ومع ذلك تم اختزال كل هذه الإنجازات في صفقات «لا تعجب البعض» وقرارات لا توافق ذوق جمهور «الهبة».
من التطبيل إلى الطعن ثم التباكي !
بعض الجماهير سخرت من صفقاته وشككت في نواياه واتهمته بأنه السبب في كل تعثر.
وعندما استقال استجابة لمطالبهم بدأوا في بكائيات المؤامرة ونسجوا خيالاً عن «أطراف أجبرته على الرحيل»!
لا أعلم لماذا وكيف يفكرون بهذا المنطق الجاهل؟!
هل هذه محاولة لتجميله بعد أن طعنوه؟
أم عجز عن مواجهة حقيقة أن الجماهير قتلت مشروعاً ناجحاً فقط لأنها متقلبة؟
الصمت لا يعجب الصاخبين
فهد لم يكن رئيساً استعراضياً بل إدارياً يعمل بصمت، لم يكن يبحث عن عدسات أو تطبيل بل عن مشروع طويل المدى مدعوم بكل ثقة من الإدارة العليا ومحبي النادي، ولكن يبدو أن هذا لا يكفي؛ لأن البعض لا يتحمل رؤية نادٍ مستقر ويفضل «التوتر اليومي»..
هل أصبح النجاح تهمة في أعين الجماهير؟
هل الترند والضجيج أهم من الكيان؟
وهل يقود مستقبل الأندية منطق العاطفة لا الحكمة ومجموعة مغردين لا يفقهون معنى الرياضة؟
ما حدث مع ابن نافل هو إنذار
عندما تُسقط الجماهير رئيساً ناجحاً بهذه الطريقة فالمشكلة لم تعد في الإدارة بل في من يحرّض الجماهير ويغذي غضبهم ثم يدّعي البراءة.
فهد بن نافل رحل ولكن المشروع الذي صنعه سيبقى مقياساً لمن يأتي بعده، وأما الجماهير المتقلّبة فعليها أن تسأل نفسها قبل أن تطالب برحيل أي إدارة أخرى، هل نحن نبحث عن مصلحة النادي أم الانسياق للعواطف؟
تابع قناة عكاظ على الواتساب
Fahd bin Nafel announced his resignation from the presidency of Al-Hilal Club, thus putting an end to an exceptional administrative journey during which the leader achieved significant accomplishments both locally and in Asia.
However, it is strange that this resignation was not met with enthusiasm or even fairness; rather, it revealed something larger than just an administrative exit—it exposed a fanbase that does not know what it wants.
From "leave" to "bring him back"... this is a conspiracy of a disturbed public logic.
The scene was embarrassing not for Fahd bin Nafel but for those who were shouting yesterday demanding his departure without reason!!
The fans who cheered for his resignation turned to crying over his exit and shouting "conspiracy"... what kind of audience is this that cannot maintain a consistent stance for the sake of a fleeting trend?!
The resignation was not surprising but rather the result of a campaign to oust him.
Fahd's resignation was not an emotional reaction but the outcome of an organized campaign of doubt and incitement that targeted his sports reputation and decisions, often crossing the boundaries of sports criticism into personal attacks.
Even some of his opponents outside the Al-Hilal family criticized that campaign due to their knowledge of the man's competence and wisdom.
Unforgivable Achievements
During Fahd bin Nafel's tenure, Al-Hilal won almost everything..
Consecutive local championships..
The AFC Champions League title..
Participation in the FIFA Club World Cup..
Yet, all these achievements were reduced to deals "that some did not like" and decisions that did not match the taste of the "trend" audience.
From flattery to stabbing and then to weeping!
Some fans mocked his deals, doubted his intentions, and accused him of being the reason for every setback.
And when he resigned in response to their demands, they began their lamentations of conspiracy and wove fantasies about "parties that forced him to leave"!
I do not understand why or how they think in this ignorant logic?!
Is this an attempt to beautify him after they stabbed him?
Or is it an inability to face the reality that the fans killed a successful project just because they are fickle?
Silence does not please the noisy
Fahd was not a showy president but an administrator who worked quietly; he was not looking for lenses or flattery but for a long-term project supported with full confidence from the upper management and club supporters. However, it seems that this is not enough; some cannot bear to see a stable club and prefer "daily tension"...
Has success become a crime in the eyes of the fans?
Is trend and noise more important than the entity?
And does the future of clubs lead by emotional logic rather than wisdom and a group of tweeters who do not understand the meaning of sports?
What happened with bin Nafel is a warning
When fans oust a successful president in this manner, the problem is no longer with the administration but with those who incite the fans and feed their anger, then claim innocence.
Fahd bin Nafel has left, but the project he created will remain a benchmark for those who come after him, and the fickle fans must ask themselves before demanding the departure of any other administration: Are we looking for the club's interest or succumbing to emotions?
However, it is strange that this resignation was not met with enthusiasm or even fairness; rather, it revealed something larger than just an administrative exit—it exposed a fanbase that does not know what it wants.
From "leave" to "bring him back"... this is a conspiracy of a disturbed public logic.
The scene was embarrassing not for Fahd bin Nafel but for those who were shouting yesterday demanding his departure without reason!!
The fans who cheered for his resignation turned to crying over his exit and shouting "conspiracy"... what kind of audience is this that cannot maintain a consistent stance for the sake of a fleeting trend?!
The resignation was not surprising but rather the result of a campaign to oust him.
Fahd's resignation was not an emotional reaction but the outcome of an organized campaign of doubt and incitement that targeted his sports reputation and decisions, often crossing the boundaries of sports criticism into personal attacks.
Even some of his opponents outside the Al-Hilal family criticized that campaign due to their knowledge of the man's competence and wisdom.
Unforgivable Achievements
During Fahd bin Nafel's tenure, Al-Hilal won almost everything..
Consecutive local championships..
The AFC Champions League title..
Participation in the FIFA Club World Cup..
Yet, all these achievements were reduced to deals "that some did not like" and decisions that did not match the taste of the "trend" audience.
From flattery to stabbing and then to weeping!
Some fans mocked his deals, doubted his intentions, and accused him of being the reason for every setback.
And when he resigned in response to their demands, they began their lamentations of conspiracy and wove fantasies about "parties that forced him to leave"!
I do not understand why or how they think in this ignorant logic?!
Is this an attempt to beautify him after they stabbed him?
Or is it an inability to face the reality that the fans killed a successful project just because they are fickle?
Silence does not please the noisy
Fahd was not a showy president but an administrator who worked quietly; he was not looking for lenses or flattery but for a long-term project supported with full confidence from the upper management and club supporters. However, it seems that this is not enough; some cannot bear to see a stable club and prefer "daily tension"...
Has success become a crime in the eyes of the fans?
Is trend and noise more important than the entity?
And does the future of clubs lead by emotional logic rather than wisdom and a group of tweeters who do not understand the meaning of sports?
What happened with bin Nafel is a warning
When fans oust a successful president in this manner, the problem is no longer with the administration but with those who incite the fans and feed their anger, then claim innocence.
Fahd bin Nafel has left, but the project he created will remain a benchmark for those who come after him, and the fickle fans must ask themselves before demanding the departure of any other administration: Are we looking for the club's interest or succumbing to emotions?


