لا أرى مشكلة في أن أضع مدرب الأهلي ضمن باقة الأوائل، فهو أي ماتياس (بيض الوجه وما قصر)، ولست ضد استمراره، لكنني ضد أن يكون اسمه قبل الكيان، فهنا أقول لا، فمن يفعل ذلك لأي سبب هو أصغر من أن ننظر له.
الكيان هو الذي يجب أن يكون أولاً وعاشراً وليس مدرباً أو إدارياً أو لاعباً، أليس كذلك؟
في المفاوضات مد وجزر، وكل طرف يلعب على مصالحه، لكن هذه المفاوضات لها أخلاقيات يجب أن تُحترم.
التسريب من أي طرف (خيانة) أو هكذا أعتقد.
ولا خوف عندي على الأهلي وشركة الأهلي، بل الخوف من ماتياس الذي يعيش حالة ارتباك بين ما يريده وبين فريق عمله، الذي بعد أن اطلعت على بعض تفاصيله أيقنت بل تأكدت أن التمديد لماتياس تحت أي ظرف لن يخدم الأهلي طالما خرج من الملعب، ومن يخرج من الملعب صعب جداً يعود أو يستعيد ثقة الآخرين فيه.
المطالبة بالاستمرار ليست مشكلة فهذا سبقتكم عليه، ولكن بطريقتي وليس طريقتكم.
قد يستمر نعم، ففي عقده بقي عام، لكن أن أمدد له يجب أن يصحح مساره، مع أنني أشك، فما أراه خارج نطاق المعقول، ولن أقول في فمي ماء طالما الأهلي هدفي.
ماتياس بكل أسف وأقولها بصوت عالٍ أصبح كرة نار في يد من، لا أعلم، لكنني أعلم أن استمراره وسط هذا الصخب والتحريض والحرب عنه بالوكالة لا يخدم الأهلي الذي يجب ألا يتحول إلى ساحة صراع هو الضحية فيها.
سجلوا عندكم واحفظوها.. ماتياس إن استمر وهو مشغول بخارج الملعب وتأثيراته عليه سيعيد لنا بعض الكوارث التي حدثت الموسم الماضي في الدوري والكأس، وربما بشكل أكثر ألماً.
فكروا في الأهلي وابعدوا عنه الشك بتكريس لليقين.
أخيراً؛ الشتم ليس رأياً
التحريض ليس نقداً
الاتهام يحتاج قرائن
النقد صفحة بيضاء اكتب من خلالها وعليها ما تريد.
الذهاب للشخص وترك عمله بتجاوز لفظي ماذا يسمى.
حرية الرأي مكفولة للجميع بشرط ألا تمس الأشخاص.
تابع قناة عكاظ على الواتساب
I see no problem in placing the Al-Ahly coach among the top ranks; he, Matthias (the fair-faced one, and he did not fall short), and I am not against his continuation. However, I am against his name being mentioned before the entity, and here I say no. Anyone who does that for any reason is too small for us to consider.
The entity should come first and tenth, not a coach, administrator, or player, right?
In negotiations, there are ups and downs, and each party plays for its interests, but these negotiations have ethics that must be respected.
Leaking information from any party is (treachery), or so I believe.
And I have no fear for Al-Ahly and the Al-Ahly Company, but the fear is for Matthias, who is in a state of confusion between what he wants and his team, which, after I reviewed some of its details, I became convinced, indeed confirmed, that extending Matthias under any circumstances will not serve Al-Ahly as long as he is out of the field. Those who leave the field find it very difficult to return or regain others' trust in them.
The demand for continuation is not a problem; I have preceded you in that, but in my way, not yours.
He may continue, yes, as there is a year left in his contract, but to extend it, he must correct his course, although I doubt it, as what I see is beyond reason, and I will not keep quiet as long as Al-Ahly is my goal.
Sadly, I say it loudly: Matthias has become a hot potato in someone's hands; I don't know whose, but I know that his continuation amid this noise, incitement, and proxy war does not serve Al-Ahly, which should not become a battleground where it is the victim.
Record this and keep it... If Matthias continues while preoccupied outside the field and its influences on him, he will bring us back some disasters that occurred last season in the league and cup, perhaps in an even more painful manner.
Think of Al-Ahly and distance it from doubt by establishing certainty.
Finally; insults are not opinions.
Incitement is not criticism.
Accusations require evidence.
Criticism is a blank page on which you can write whatever you want.
Going to a person and leaving their work with a verbal transgression, what is that called?
Freedom of opinion is guaranteed for all, provided it does not harm individuals.
The entity should come first and tenth, not a coach, administrator, or player, right?
In negotiations, there are ups and downs, and each party plays for its interests, but these negotiations have ethics that must be respected.
Leaking information from any party is (treachery), or so I believe.
And I have no fear for Al-Ahly and the Al-Ahly Company, but the fear is for Matthias, who is in a state of confusion between what he wants and his team, which, after I reviewed some of its details, I became convinced, indeed confirmed, that extending Matthias under any circumstances will not serve Al-Ahly as long as he is out of the field. Those who leave the field find it very difficult to return or regain others' trust in them.
The demand for continuation is not a problem; I have preceded you in that, but in my way, not yours.
He may continue, yes, as there is a year left in his contract, but to extend it, he must correct his course, although I doubt it, as what I see is beyond reason, and I will not keep quiet as long as Al-Ahly is my goal.
Sadly, I say it loudly: Matthias has become a hot potato in someone's hands; I don't know whose, but I know that his continuation amid this noise, incitement, and proxy war does not serve Al-Ahly, which should not become a battleground where it is the victim.
Record this and keep it... If Matthias continues while preoccupied outside the field and its influences on him, he will bring us back some disasters that occurred last season in the league and cup, perhaps in an even more painful manner.
Think of Al-Ahly and distance it from doubt by establishing certainty.
Finally; insults are not opinions.
Incitement is not criticism.
Accusations require evidence.
Criticism is a blank page on which you can write whatever you want.
Going to a person and leaving their work with a verbal transgression, what is that called?
Freedom of opinion is guaranteed for all, provided it does not harm individuals.


