روعة تطبيق «حضوري»، الذي طبقته وزارة التعليم لمنسوبيها، تجعلني أتطرق باختصار لجوانبه المختلفة، إذ يسجل الحضور والانصراف بدقة عالية باستخدام تقنيات حيوية (بصمة الوجه، الصوت، الإصبع)، وتحديد الموقع الجغرافي، ومن ميزاته؛ لوحة تحكم إدارية للمتابعة الفورية، وتسهيل طلبات الاستئذان، وتقليل الجهد والوقت في الإجراءات اليدوية.
التطبيق بميزاته المشرقة إلا أنه لم يخلُ من بعض العيوب، فالتجربة أثبتت الحاجة إلى بعض التعديلات لضمان مرونة أكبر للمعلمين، خصوصاً في ما يتعلق بانصرافهم وخروجهم وعودتهم أثناء اليوم الدراسي، فالمعلم في بعض الأيام يخلو جدوله من بعض الحصص والمهمات الإشرافية.
التساؤل المطروح: ما المانع أن يُمنح المعلم فرصة للراحة، أو قضاء بعض شؤونه الخاصة خلال هذا الوقت، أسوة ببقية المواطنين الذين لديهم التزامات لا يمكن أن تُقضى إلا في أوقات الدوام الرسمي؟ بل إن من المنطقي أن تُتاح للمعلم مغادرة المدرسة إذا لم تعد لديه حصص أو واجبات إشرافية، حتى لو خصّص له مديره المباشر يوماً أو يومين في الأسبوع يستطيع من خلالها الاستفادة في قضاء حوائجه، فجلوس المعلم داخل المدرسة حتى لو لم تكن لديه أعمال يقوم بها، أو قام بها، وينتظر الساعات السبع لتنقضي ويخرج من سجنه لا داعي له، غير ما يعانيه المعلم خارج الدوام من تحضير للدروس وتجهيز الأنشطة والاطلاع على الواجبات.
لا نطالب بإلغاء النظام، وإنما تطويره ليكون أكثر عدلاً ومرونة، بحيث يوازن بين حق المؤسسة في الانضباط، وحق المعلم في بيئة عمل إنسانية، فالتخفيف من القيود والرقابة الصارمة لا ينعكس إيجاباً على نفسية المعلم فحسب، بل كذلك على عطائه داخل الفصل، ويحقق في النهاية الهدف الأسمى وهو مصلحة الطالب.
إن المرونة المدروسة لا تعني الفوضى، بل تعني الثقة المتبادلة بين المعلم والمؤسسة، وهو ما يصنع بيئة عمل محترمة ومستقرة، ويعزز الإنتاجية الحقيقية التي تسعى إليها وزارة التعليم.
تابع قناة عكاظ على الواتساب
عبدالله سعيد العرياني
asmasm1235t@gmail.com
The brilliance of the "Hadhouri" application, implemented by the Ministry of Education for its staff, prompts me to briefly touch on its various aspects. It accurately records attendance and departure using high-tech biometric methods (face recognition, voice, fingerprint), along with geographical location tracking. Among its features are an administrative dashboard for real-time monitoring, facilitation of leave requests, and a reduction in effort and time spent on manual procedures.
Despite the application's bright features, it is not without some flaws. The experience has shown the need for certain adjustments to ensure greater flexibility for teachers, especially regarding their departures and returns during the school day. On some days, a teacher's schedule may lack certain classes and supervisory tasks.
The question arises: what prevents a teacher from having the opportunity to rest or attend to personal matters during this time, similar to other citizens who have commitments that can only be fulfilled during official working hours? It is even logical for a teacher to be allowed to leave the school if they no longer have classes or supervisory duties, even if their direct manager allocates them a day or two a week to handle their personal needs. Keeping a teacher inside the school, even when they have no tasks to perform or have completed them, waiting for the seven hours to pass to leave their confinement is unnecessary, especially considering the preparation for lessons, organizing activities, and reviewing assignments that teachers deal with outside of working hours.
We do not demand the abolition of the system, but rather its development to be more just and flexible, balancing the institution's right to discipline with the teacher's right to a humane working environment. Easing strict constraints and supervision not only positively affects the teacher's morale but also enhances their performance in the classroom, ultimately achieving the highest goal, which is the student's benefit.
Studied flexibility does not mean chaos; it means mutual trust between the teacher and the institution, which creates a respectful and stable working environment and enhances the genuine productivity that the Ministry of Education seeks.
Despite the application's bright features, it is not without some flaws. The experience has shown the need for certain adjustments to ensure greater flexibility for teachers, especially regarding their departures and returns during the school day. On some days, a teacher's schedule may lack certain classes and supervisory tasks.
The question arises: what prevents a teacher from having the opportunity to rest or attend to personal matters during this time, similar to other citizens who have commitments that can only be fulfilled during official working hours? It is even logical for a teacher to be allowed to leave the school if they no longer have classes or supervisory duties, even if their direct manager allocates them a day or two a week to handle their personal needs. Keeping a teacher inside the school, even when they have no tasks to perform or have completed them, waiting for the seven hours to pass to leave their confinement is unnecessary, especially considering the preparation for lessons, organizing activities, and reviewing assignments that teachers deal with outside of working hours.
We do not demand the abolition of the system, but rather its development to be more just and flexible, balancing the institution's right to discipline with the teacher's right to a humane working environment. Easing strict constraints and supervision not only positively affects the teacher's morale but also enhances their performance in the classroom, ultimately achieving the highest goal, which is the student's benefit.
Studied flexibility does not mean chaos; it means mutual trust between the teacher and the institution, which creates a respectful and stable working environment and enhances the genuine productivity that the Ministry of Education seeks.


