زبد الكلام

I am tired of the statements of speakers, on every matter, each claiming to be right.

The matter is settled - for me - as each of you resembles the motion of a millstone (stone on stone) without any seeds.

And every time I scream: have mercy on us from the froth of words.

It seems that this froth has overwhelmed us, overflowing to the point where it can no longer be removed, or we can no longer wait for the sun's rays to dry it up.

- Whoever seeks the truth must exert effort; if they know it, knowledge alone suffices, and they are not required to prove it if they lack the ability.

* * **

I reiterate that human studies can be deleted or established, and I wrote an article titled "The History of the Problematic Human Soul" in hopes of correcting what I said in that article. It seems that reading has lost its weight among readers, or people have refrained from correcting, as there has been an abundance of writings that have no place in our present time. In any case, I stated, relying on an old reading that has settled in my memory, that psychology emerged through the narratives of the great novelist Dostoevsky, where the characters in his novels were complex, and one of his readers became enamored with them, applying the traits of those characters to his patients, classifying all pathological psychological cases according to the fictional characters he read.

Biographies record that Wilhelm Wundt (August 16, 1832 – August 31, 1920) is the founder of modern psychology; he was a physician, physicist, and German philosopher. Was Wilhelm Wundt the one enamored with Dostoevsky's literature?

From that information that has settled in my memory, I was once asked by some friends: Do you know the psychological disorders of those in your life, or who have passed through or lingered in the details of your days?

My response was affirmative, but shyness prevents me from confronting them about their disorders.

And just as they are patients, I am a patient like them; only the types of our psychological disorders differ,

based on the belief that the novelist is the most capable of understanding the human soul, more so than any psychologist or student of psychology.

And those who say that the world Freud is the one who established psychology, I find myself reverting to my knowledge that psychology emerged from the narratives of the novelist Dostoevsky. The scholar

Freud studied the cases of the obsessed and the insane, gathering his observations and applying them as pathological psychological cases to the insane, while the novelist is able to dive directly into the psyche of the written character, revealing the impurities and life ailments that indicate the type of psychological disorder of the character.

This matter is not historically confirmed, but I lean towards it with certainty that for every science, there are researchers stemming from the problematic issue the researcher investigates, and the human soul, closest to discovering its impulses (the good and the evil), is the novelist; he is the diver who stands on the terrains and depths of that psyche.

This is a correct or incorrect opinion among scholars and researchers of the terrains and depths of psychology, and thus, it is a call to re-read the historical context of the human soul in its disorders.

Of course, I do not want to be definitive about what I said in the introduction of the article, but rather to provoke interest in what the human soul is like, and I can almost assert that it is still far from the studies that occurred previously, and in this time of frothy words, we must rely on what has settled in the soul.