بدأت أتحرر مؤخراً من إحدى أقدم وأسوأ الصور القليلة التي تحتفظ بها ذاكرتي ومخيلتي عن المعلم، والتي صبغت نظرتي لمهنة التعليم ككل منذ طفولتي، تلك الصورة التي تشكَّلت في الصف الرابع الابتدائي وبقيت واستمرت في اللاوعي، لا يوقظها في الوعي إلا اليوم العالمي للمعلم أو كلما جاءت مناسبة للحديث عن التعليم.
نحن لا نختار ما تلتقطه عدسة الطفولة ولا نتحكم بما تؤرشفه الذاكرة وما تستدعيه المخيلة أو ما يتم حذفه أو حتى الكيفية التي تتم فيها معالجة الأحداث والمواقف حسب تربيتنا وتنشئتنا وقدراتنا في طفولتنا وما يتماهى معها ويسهم بتشكيلها، لكن المؤكد أن أحداثاً ومواقف بعينها ولأسباب نفسية وتربوية، تستقر لدينا وتصبح بنية تحتية لقناعاتنا وتعاملاتنا في مقتبل أعمارنا.
لشدة السذاجة أو البراءة، لم أفهم سبب تعمد معلم الرياضيات في الصف الرابع الابتدائي تجاهل كل محاولاتي رفع يدي للإجابة على أسئلته في الصف، مما استدعاني أن أتنقل وأغير مكان جلوسي في ذلك الصف لأكثر من مرة علّني أفوز بسؤال من ذلك المعلم. لكن كل محاولاتي باءت بالفشل. ولم أفهم السؤال الذي لم أفهم الإجابة عليه حينها: هل يتعمّد هذا المعلم تجاهل وجودي في الصف؟ ولماذا؟ هل لديه موقف مني؟ هل تفكيري أو طريقة لباسي تزعجه؟
لم تسمح لي غضاضة التجربة حينها أن أطرح أسئلتي المحيرة أو معرفة لمن أتوجه بها، لكن الأثر في نفسي كان بليغاً، ربما وجَّه ضربة مبكرة لثقتي في نفسي وزعزع حماسي ورغبتي وإقبالي على التعليم حينها. ربما كانت ستكون الصدمة أقل وطأة لو أن معلم الرياضيات يتعامل مع الطلبة بنفس التجاهل وعدم التفاعل لهانت كثيراً. لكنه كان يسأل أغلب الأطفال وبعضهم كان يحظى بنصيب الأسد من الأسئلة في الحصة الواحدة. أما الأطفال الذين لم يتم توجيه أسئلة لهم لا أذكر إن كانوا كثيرين، ولا أعرف إن كان ذلك يريحهم، أم أنه يزعجهم كما أزعجني!
في المقابل، وهو ما يزيد حيرتي وحنقي على معلم الرياضيات، هو أن مستواي التفاعلي والتعليمي ليس سيئاً مع بقية مواد الصف الرابع ومعلمينا في الصف الرابع الابتدائي. فقد كانوا يتعاملون ويتفاعلون معي بأسلوب وطريقة طبيعية داخل الصف وخارجه، بل إن معلم اللغة العربية طلبني لأكثر من مرة لأحضر إلى الصف الخامس كي أجيب على أسئلة وجهها لبعض الطلبة في الصف الخامس الابتدائي فلم يجيبوا عليها، دلالة على أني متفاعل ولي حضور ومستوى تعليمي وتواصلي مع المعلمين الطبيعيين والأسوياء.
إن ظاهرة تفضيل المعلم لطلبة بعينهم دون سواهم داخل الصف أو خارجه، أو تحيّز المعلم ضد طلبة بعينهم وخاصة في مرحلة الطفولة سواء بقصد أو بدون قصد تستدعي وقفة جادة وحازمة من المؤسسة التعليمية. أولاً هذه الظاهرة لا بد من دراستها إذا لم تُدرس بعد، كما يجب أن يتم التعامل معها بحزم ومسؤولية لخطورتها وتأثيرها على نفسية وذهنية الطفل حاضراً ومستقبلاً. فإذا كان سلوك المعلم هذا متكرراً ومقصوداً، ففي أغلب الظن أنها حالة تستدعي العلاج، وإذا كانت غير مقصودة فيتم تنبيه المعلم لها وتمكينه من التغلب عليها، وبكلتا الحالتين، هذه الظاهرة خطيرة ويجب ألا يستهان بها، وهي غير مقبولة ويجب أن تُراقب وأن تتوقف. من المهم أن تتم توعية الأطفال وتنبيههم إلى رفض هذا السلوك وعدم القبول به، من خلال تقديم شكوى إلى إدارة المدرسة أو المختص بهذا الشأن في المدرسة. أو من خلال المنصات الإلكترونية الخاصة بذلك.
أخيراً، إنني أتألم وأتحسّر من تجربتي المريرة هذه التي تخطت الصف الرابع الابتدائي إلى ما بعده، خاصة في علاقتي بالرياضيات. ليس في نفسي أي حقد أو كراهية ضد معلم الرياضيات رغم كل ما تسبّب به لي نفسياً وتعليمياً، إلا أنني أسجل التقدير والعرفان والامتنان لكل المعلمين الذين لم يحاولوا أن ينحازوا لطلاب بعينهم أو ضد طلاب بعينهم، بقصد أو بدون قصد.
عبداللطيف الضويحي
سؤالي للمعلم في يومه العالمي
6 أكتوبر 2025 - 23:47
|
آخر تحديث 6 أكتوبر 2025 - 23:47
تابع قناة عكاظ على الواتساب
I recently began to free myself from one of the oldest and worst images I hold in my memory and imagination about the teacher, which has colored my view of the teaching profession as a whole since my childhood. This image was formed in the fourth grade and remained in my subconscious, only awakened by World Teacher's Day or whenever an occasion arises to talk about education.
We do not choose what the lens of childhood captures, nor do we control what memory archives or what imagination recalls, or what gets deleted, or even how events and situations are processed according to our upbringing, our childhood capabilities, and what aligns with them and contributes to their formation. However, it is certain that specific events and situations, for psychological and educational reasons, settle within us and become the underlying structure of our convictions and interactions in our early years.
Out of sheer naivety or innocence, I did not understand why my fourth-grade math teacher deliberately ignored all my attempts to raise my hand to answer his questions in class, prompting me to move and change my seating position multiple times in hopes of being called on by that teacher. But all my attempts failed. I did not understand the question I couldn't answer back then: Was this teacher intentionally ignoring my presence in class? And why? Did he have an issue with me? Did my thinking or the way I dressed annoy him?
The harshness of the experience at that time did not allow me to voice my puzzling questions or know whom to address them to, but the impact on me was profound; it perhaps dealt an early blow to my self-confidence and shook my enthusiasm, desire, and engagement in education at that time. Perhaps the shock would have been less severe if the math teacher treated the students with the same disregard and lack of interaction; it would have made it much easier. However, he asked most of the children, and some received the lion's share of questions in a single lesson. As for the children who were not asked questions, I don't recall if there were many, nor do I know if that comforted them or annoyed them as it did me!
Conversely, what adds to my confusion and frustration with the math teacher is that my interactive and educational level was not poor with the other subjects in the fourth grade and with our teachers. They interacted with me in a natural manner both inside and outside the classroom. In fact, the Arabic language teacher called on me multiple times to come to the fifth grade to answer questions directed at some students in the fifth grade who did not answer them, indicating that I was engaged and had a presence and educational and communicative level with normal and healthy teachers.
The phenomenon of a teacher favoring certain students over others inside or outside the classroom, or the teacher's bias against specific students, especially in childhood, whether intentionally or unintentionally, calls for a serious and firm stance from the educational institution. First, this phenomenon must be studied if it has not been studied yet, and it should be dealt with firmly and responsibly due to its seriousness and impact on the child's psyche and mentality now and in the future. If this teacher's behavior is repetitive and intentional, it is most likely a case that requires intervention; if it is unintentional, the teacher should be alerted and enabled to overcome it. In both cases, this phenomenon is dangerous and should not be underestimated; it is unacceptable and must be monitored and stopped. It is important to educate children and alert them to reject this behavior and not accept it, by submitting a complaint to the school administration or the relevant specialist in the school, or through the appropriate electronic platforms.
Finally, I feel pain and regret from this bitter experience of mine that extended beyond the fourth grade, especially in my relationship with mathematics. I hold no hatred or animosity against the math teacher despite all the psychological and educational harm he caused me; however, I express my appreciation, gratitude, and recognition to all the teachers who did not try to favor certain students over others, whether intentionally or unintentionally.
We do not choose what the lens of childhood captures, nor do we control what memory archives or what imagination recalls, or what gets deleted, or even how events and situations are processed according to our upbringing, our childhood capabilities, and what aligns with them and contributes to their formation. However, it is certain that specific events and situations, for psychological and educational reasons, settle within us and become the underlying structure of our convictions and interactions in our early years.
Out of sheer naivety or innocence, I did not understand why my fourth-grade math teacher deliberately ignored all my attempts to raise my hand to answer his questions in class, prompting me to move and change my seating position multiple times in hopes of being called on by that teacher. But all my attempts failed. I did not understand the question I couldn't answer back then: Was this teacher intentionally ignoring my presence in class? And why? Did he have an issue with me? Did my thinking or the way I dressed annoy him?
The harshness of the experience at that time did not allow me to voice my puzzling questions or know whom to address them to, but the impact on me was profound; it perhaps dealt an early blow to my self-confidence and shook my enthusiasm, desire, and engagement in education at that time. Perhaps the shock would have been less severe if the math teacher treated the students with the same disregard and lack of interaction; it would have made it much easier. However, he asked most of the children, and some received the lion's share of questions in a single lesson. As for the children who were not asked questions, I don't recall if there were many, nor do I know if that comforted them or annoyed them as it did me!
Conversely, what adds to my confusion and frustration with the math teacher is that my interactive and educational level was not poor with the other subjects in the fourth grade and with our teachers. They interacted with me in a natural manner both inside and outside the classroom. In fact, the Arabic language teacher called on me multiple times to come to the fifth grade to answer questions directed at some students in the fifth grade who did not answer them, indicating that I was engaged and had a presence and educational and communicative level with normal and healthy teachers.
The phenomenon of a teacher favoring certain students over others inside or outside the classroom, or the teacher's bias against specific students, especially in childhood, whether intentionally or unintentionally, calls for a serious and firm stance from the educational institution. First, this phenomenon must be studied if it has not been studied yet, and it should be dealt with firmly and responsibly due to its seriousness and impact on the child's psyche and mentality now and in the future. If this teacher's behavior is repetitive and intentional, it is most likely a case that requires intervention; if it is unintentional, the teacher should be alerted and enabled to overcome it. In both cases, this phenomenon is dangerous and should not be underestimated; it is unacceptable and must be monitored and stopped. It is important to educate children and alert them to reject this behavior and not accept it, by submitting a complaint to the school administration or the relevant specialist in the school, or through the appropriate electronic platforms.
Finally, I feel pain and regret from this bitter experience of mine that extended beyond the fourth grade, especially in my relationship with mathematics. I hold no hatred or animosity against the math teacher despite all the psychological and educational harm he caused me; however, I express my appreciation, gratitude, and recognition to all the teachers who did not try to favor certain students over others, whether intentionally or unintentionally.


