عنوان هذا المقال مستلهم من الرواية الروسية الأشهر «الحرب والسلام» لمؤلفها المعروف ليو تولستوي والتي تصنّف كواحدة من أهم الروايات في تاريخ الأدب الإنساني وتتناول المآسي الناجمة عن الغزو الفرنسي بقيادة نابليون بونابارت على الأراضي الروسية. تذكرت ذلك وأنا أتابع إيقاف إطلاق النار «الفوري» الذي أعلنه الرئيس الأمريكي دونالد ترمب بين إيران وإسرائيل بعد المواجهة العسكرية العنيفه بينهما. هكذا وفجأة حسم الأمر بأمر ساكن البيت الأبيض. وقد كان لافتاً جداً أن الإعلان جاء متخلياً عن أهداف تغيير النظام، والذي أعلنه ترمب بنفسه، ولا تم القضاء على البرنامج النووي، وهي مسألة مثار جدل كبير الآن داخل دوائر الكونغرس والمؤسسات الإعلامية التي تشكك في تصريح ترمب بأن الضربات العسكرية الأمريكية «تمكّنت من إنهاء البرنامج النووي»، وهم يستندون في ذلك على معلومات استخباراتية أولية.
المفهوم الآن أننا في مرحلة وقف إطلاق نار وليس بمرحلة سلام، ووقف إطلاق النار ممكن أن يتغيّر وتعود حالة الحرب كما كانت. لأن المسألة ببساطة غير عادلة، فمنذ انطلاقة البرنامج النووي الإسرائيلي في الخمسينات الميلادية من القرن الماضي والمنطقة تعج بمشاريع تسعى لمماثلة المشروع الإسرائيلي والحصول على قنبلة نووية، بدأت مصر نواة مشروعها وقضت عليه إسرائيل سريعاً باغتيال أبرز علماء المشروع، ثم سعى العراق لمشروع نووي طموح قصفته إسرائيل في عملية عسكرية مباغتة في الثمانينات الميلادية من القرن الماضي، تلا ذلك محاولة سورية بالاشتراك مع كوريا الشمالية في دير الزور قضت عليه إسرائيل بقصف صاروخي من الجو.
لم يتم الاعتراف لا إسرائيلياً ولا دولياً بوجود المفاعل النووي الإسرائيلي في ديمونا ولا سمح لوكالة الطاقة الذرية بإجراء الفحص التقني عليه كما هو متبع، بالرغم من التعامل معه كمسألة سرية إلا أنه أصبح أفضح الأسرار بما في ذلك على الصعيد الداخلي الإسرائيلي نفسه.
فضح البرنامج النووي الإسرائيلي أحد الموظفين التقنيين العاملين فيه وهو موردخاي فيعنونو والذي فنّد تفاصيله في مقابلة مدوية مع الصحيفة البريطانية «التايمز» في عام ١٩٨٦ وبعد ذلك خطفته عناصر المخابرات الإسرائيلية الموساد من أوروبا وحاكمته وأودعته السجن. عرف البرنامج النووي الإسرائيلي بخيار شمشون وهو مستوحى من القصة التوراتية الشهيرة التي يحطم فيها بطل القصة المعبد وهو يصيح صيحته الشهيرة «علي وعلى أعدائي»
الدول العربية نادت ولا تزال تطالب بجعل منطقة الشرق الأوسط منطقة خاليه تماماً من أسلحة الدمار الشامل وعلى رأسها القنابل النووية.
إيقاف إطلاق النار هو حل مؤقت لمشكلة عويصة غابت عنها معيار العدالة ومقاييس الإنصاف، طالما استمر غض البصر عن مفاعل إسرائيل النووي ستكون هناك الذريعة والأسباب لدول المنطقة للسعي لمشاريع مشابهة ولكن هذا ليس غريباً على دولة ومنذ الإعلان عن قيامها وهي تتمدد وتعتدي على حدود الدول المجاورة لها وتعتدي على أراضيها وتحتلها بلا أي رادع ولا عقاب. دول المنطقة تأمل وترغب في العيش بسلام وليس في حالة وقف إطلاق نار، ولكن لن يتحقق السلام المنشود ما لم يكن مبنياً على العدالة.
تابع قناة عكاظ على الواتساب
The title of this article is inspired by the famous Russian novel "War and Peace" by the well-known author Leo Tolstoy, which is classified as one of the most important novels in the history of human literature and addresses the tragedies resulting from the French invasion led by Napoleon Bonaparte on Russian lands. I remembered this as I followed the "immediate" ceasefire announced by U.S. President Donald Trump between Iran and Israel after the violent military confrontation between them. Suddenly, the matter was resolved by an order from the occupant of the White House. It was very striking that the announcement came abandoning the goals of regime change, which Trump himself had declared, and that the nuclear program was not eliminated, a matter that is now a major point of contention within congressional circles and media institutions that doubt Trump's statement that U.S. military strikes "managed to end the nuclear program," relying on preliminary intelligence information.
The concept now is that we are in a ceasefire stage, not a peace stage, and the ceasefire can change, and the state of war can return as it was. Because the issue is simply unfair; since the launch of the Israeli nuclear program in the 1950s, the region has been rife with projects seeking to emulate the Israeli project and acquire a nuclear bomb. Egypt began the nucleus of its project, which Israel quickly eliminated by assassinating the most prominent scientists of the project. Then Iraq pursued an ambitious nuclear project that Israel bombed in a surprise military operation in the 1980s. This was followed by a Syrian attempt in collaboration with North Korea in Deir ez-Zor, which Israel destroyed with aerial missile strikes.
No recognition has been given, either by Israel or internationally, to the existence of the Israeli nuclear reactor in Dimona, nor has the International Atomic Energy Agency been allowed to conduct technical inspections on it as is customary. Despite being treated as a secret matter, it has become one of the most exposed secrets, including within Israeli internal circles.
The Israeli nuclear program was exposed by one of the technical employees working in it, Mordechai Vanunu, who detailed it in a sensational interview with the British newspaper "The Times" in 1986. After that, he was kidnapped by Israeli intelligence, Mossad, from Europe, tried, and imprisoned. The Israeli nuclear program is known as the Samson Option, inspired by the famous biblical story in which the hero of the story destroys the temple while shouting his famous cry, "Let me die with the Philistines."
Arab countries have called and continue to demand that the Middle East be completely free of weapons of mass destruction, foremost among them nuclear bombs.
The ceasefire is a temporary solution to a complex problem that lacks standards of justice and measures of fairness. As long as the Israeli nuclear reactor remains overlooked, there will be justifications and reasons for countries in the region to seek similar projects. But this is not strange for a state that, since its declaration of establishment, has been expanding and violating the borders of neighboring countries, occupying their lands without any deterrent or punishment. The countries of the region hope and wish to live in peace, not in a state of ceasefire, but the desired peace will not be achieved unless it is based on justice.
The concept now is that we are in a ceasefire stage, not a peace stage, and the ceasefire can change, and the state of war can return as it was. Because the issue is simply unfair; since the launch of the Israeli nuclear program in the 1950s, the region has been rife with projects seeking to emulate the Israeli project and acquire a nuclear bomb. Egypt began the nucleus of its project, which Israel quickly eliminated by assassinating the most prominent scientists of the project. Then Iraq pursued an ambitious nuclear project that Israel bombed in a surprise military operation in the 1980s. This was followed by a Syrian attempt in collaboration with North Korea in Deir ez-Zor, which Israel destroyed with aerial missile strikes.
No recognition has been given, either by Israel or internationally, to the existence of the Israeli nuclear reactor in Dimona, nor has the International Atomic Energy Agency been allowed to conduct technical inspections on it as is customary. Despite being treated as a secret matter, it has become one of the most exposed secrets, including within Israeli internal circles.
The Israeli nuclear program was exposed by one of the technical employees working in it, Mordechai Vanunu, who detailed it in a sensational interview with the British newspaper "The Times" in 1986. After that, he was kidnapped by Israeli intelligence, Mossad, from Europe, tried, and imprisoned. The Israeli nuclear program is known as the Samson Option, inspired by the famous biblical story in which the hero of the story destroys the temple while shouting his famous cry, "Let me die with the Philistines."
Arab countries have called and continue to demand that the Middle East be completely free of weapons of mass destruction, foremost among them nuclear bombs.
The ceasefire is a temporary solution to a complex problem that lacks standards of justice and measures of fairness. As long as the Israeli nuclear reactor remains overlooked, there will be justifications and reasons for countries in the region to seek similar projects. But this is not strange for a state that, since its declaration of establishment, has been expanding and violating the borders of neighboring countries, occupying their lands without any deterrent or punishment. The countries of the region hope and wish to live in peace, not in a state of ceasefire, but the desired peace will not be achieved unless it is based on justice.


