ما بين شوط وآخر شاهت وجوه، وصغرت عبارات، واختفى في ظروف غامضة كثر، وبقيت إدانتهم من خلال كلام قلت حوله الحذف أهون من الهروب..!
ثلاثة أهداف تقدّم بها الهلال في الشوط الأول استغلها (الحمقى)، ووزعوا شماتتهم عبر موقع (إكس)، كلام لا يقره عاقل، نسوا أن هناك شوطاً ثانياً فيه (يُكرَم الشامت أو يُهان)، شوطاً يبرز الوجه الآخر لمعنى أن تكون أو لا تكون.
ماتياس رمى في الشوط الثاني بكل أوراقه، وحول انزاغي إلى مدرب يبحث حوله عن مدافعين لإشراكهم بعد أن تمّت محاصرته في نصف ملعبه.
لم يكن الأهلي يحتاج إلا لثماني دقائق من أجل اللحاق بالهلال، لكن للأسف كما جرت العادة سرق الحكم من الأهلي ضربة جزاء، ومرّر هدفاً للهلال من فاول واضح للأهلي، والعهدة في الحالتين على ذمة المحلل التحكيمي سمير عثمان.
وزاد عصام عبدالفتاح في تأكيد المؤكد بإقرار ضربة الجزاء في الربع الأول من بداية المباراة، فماذا يا ترى يمكن أن تقول دائرة التحكيم عما ارتكب من جرم تحكيمي ضد الأهلي؟
نادراً أن تجد فريقاً يضع تحت ضغط حكم سلبي ونتيجة غير متوقعة ومن ثم يعود في دقائق معدودات..!
لا يفعلها إلّا فريق عظيم، يصنع من المستحيل واقعاً..!
انتهت المباراة، وبقيت ارتداداتها بين قهر مقهور وغبن مغبون، وهذا أمر طبيعي في كرة القدم..
أما غير الطبيعي فما حدث بين الشوطين من (هرج ومرج)، لقيت منه بقايا حروف مبعثرة ضحكت منها، ولم أشفق على أصحابها..
(2)
عصام عبدالفتاح لـ #في_المرمى: هناك ركلة جزاء صحيحة لم يتم احتسابها للأهلي في الدقيقة الـ15 من المباراة.. وهناك خطأ تحكيمي في هدف #الهلال الثاني؛ لأنه لم يحتسب خطأ لصالح #الأهلي في وسط الملعب.
(3)
سمير عثمان:
- د 15 ضربة جزاء لم تحتسب للأهلي.
- د 25 يوجد خطأ قبل هدف الهلال، إذ كان يجب إيقاف اللعب.
أحمد الشمراني
الحق يقال
الأهلي هزم الهلال والحكم
21 سبتمبر 2025 - 00:01
|
آخر تحديث 21 سبتمبر 2025 - 00:01
تابع قناة عكاظ على الواتساب
Between one half and another, faces turned pale, phrases shrank, and many disappeared under mysterious circumstances, while their condemnation remained through words I said that deletion was easier than escape..!
Three goals were scored by Al-Hilal in the first half, which the "fools" took advantage of, spreading their glee through the (X) platform, words that no sane person would endorse. They forgot that there was a second half in which (the mocker is honored or humiliated), a half that reveals the other side of what it means to be or not to be.
Matthias played all his cards in the second half, turning Inzaghi into a coach searching for defenders to include after being cornered in his half of the field.
Al-Ahli only needed eight minutes to catch up with Al-Hilal, but unfortunately, as usual, the referee robbed Al-Ahli of a penalty kick and allowed a goal for Al-Hilal from a clear foul on Al-Ahli, and the responsibility in both cases lies with the referee analyst Samir Osman.
Issam Abdel Fattah further confirmed the obvious by acknowledging the penalty kick in the first quarter of the match; so what, I wonder, can the refereeing committee say about the officiating crimes committed against Al-Ahli?
It is rare to find a team that can withstand the pressure of a negative referee and an unexpected result, and then come back in just a few minutes..!
Only a great team can turn the impossible into reality..!
The match ended, and its repercussions remained between the oppressed and the aggrieved, which is a natural occurrence in football..
As for the unnatural, it was what happened between the halves with (commotion and chaos), from which I found scattered letters that made me laugh, and I felt no pity for their owners..
(2)
Issam Abdel Fattah to #In_the_goal: There was a correct penalty kick that was not awarded to Al-Ahli in the 15th minute of the match.. and there was a refereeing error in Al-Hilal's second goal because a foul in favor of #Al-Ahli in the midfield was not called.
(3)
Samir Osman:
- 15th minute: Penalty not awarded to Al-Ahli.
- 25th minute: There was a foul before Al-Hilal's goal; the game should have been stopped.
Three goals were scored by Al-Hilal in the first half, which the "fools" took advantage of, spreading their glee through the (X) platform, words that no sane person would endorse. They forgot that there was a second half in which (the mocker is honored or humiliated), a half that reveals the other side of what it means to be or not to be.
Matthias played all his cards in the second half, turning Inzaghi into a coach searching for defenders to include after being cornered in his half of the field.
Al-Ahli only needed eight minutes to catch up with Al-Hilal, but unfortunately, as usual, the referee robbed Al-Ahli of a penalty kick and allowed a goal for Al-Hilal from a clear foul on Al-Ahli, and the responsibility in both cases lies with the referee analyst Samir Osman.
Issam Abdel Fattah further confirmed the obvious by acknowledging the penalty kick in the first quarter of the match; so what, I wonder, can the refereeing committee say about the officiating crimes committed against Al-Ahli?
It is rare to find a team that can withstand the pressure of a negative referee and an unexpected result, and then come back in just a few minutes..!
Only a great team can turn the impossible into reality..!
The match ended, and its repercussions remained between the oppressed and the aggrieved, which is a natural occurrence in football..
As for the unnatural, it was what happened between the halves with (commotion and chaos), from which I found scattered letters that made me laugh, and I felt no pity for their owners..
(2)
Issam Abdel Fattah to #In_the_goal: There was a correct penalty kick that was not awarded to Al-Ahli in the 15th minute of the match.. and there was a refereeing error in Al-Hilal's second goal because a foul in favor of #Al-Ahli in the midfield was not called.
(3)
Samir Osman:
- 15th minute: Penalty not awarded to Al-Ahli.
- 25th minute: There was a foul before Al-Hilal's goal; the game should have been stopped.
