كشف مصدر أردني مطلع، اليوم (الخميس)، بدء النيابة العامة الأسبوع الحالي استدعاء أشخاص يتسترون على أملاك جماعة الإخوان الإرهابية المحظورة، وفقاً لما نقته وكالة الأنباء الأردنية (بترا).
وأوضحت الوكالة أن لجنة حل الجماعة التابعة لوزارة التنمية الاجتماعية كانت دعت كل متستر على أملاك الجماعة إلى تسوية أوضاعهم لمدة شهر (انتهت بتاريخ 14 يونيو الماضي)، قبل أن تحيل الملف إلى القضاء.
ونقلت الوكالة عن المصدر المطلع قوله: تقدم عدد من الأشخاص إلى لجنة الحل بإقرارات تفيد بعدم ملكيتهم لأموال منقولة وغير منقولة، واعترفوا بأنهم يحتفظون بها للجماعة، وقد تمت التسوية، وآلت إلى صندوق دعم الجمعيات التابع لوزارة التنمية الاجتماعية سنداً لأحكام المادة 25 من قانون الجمعيات النافذ، مبيناً أن شركاء في حصص أراض وعقارات قد أقروا بأنهم ليسوا الملاك الأصليين لها، وإنما احتفظوا بها بطلب من الجماعة المحظورة، بينما تعنت ورفض شركاء معهم الاعتراف وأصروا على ملكيتهم للأموال (العقارات والأراضي).
وأوضح المصدر أن مفوضين بالتوقيع على حساب بنكي مشترك بإحدى المحافظات أقروا بأن الأموال التي كانوا يحتفظون بها ليست لهم، وإنما للجماعة المحظورة، وقد تم نقل تلك الأموال إلى صندوق دعم الجمعيات وفق الإجراءات القانونية.
وأشارت الوكالة إلى أنه كل متستر على أملاك الجماعة سيُعرّض نفسه للمساءلة القانونية بتهم غسل الأموال وإساءة الائتمان، وتهم أخرى في حال رفضه الإقرار بالحقيقة وبعد مواجهته بالأدلة، ومنها الخبرة والتحليل المالي، ووفق القانون، يمكن لأي شخص يحتفظ بملكية لغيره أن يتجنب التهم التي قد تسند إليه من قبل الادعاء العام في حال التنازل الطوعي والإقرار بعدم ملكية الأموال.
النيابة الأردنية تستدعي متسترين على أملاك «الإخوان» الإرهابية
31 يوليو 2025 - 13:39
|
آخر تحديث 31 يوليو 2025 - 13:39
النيابة الأردنية
تابع قناة عكاظ على الواتساب
«عكاظ» (عمان) okaz_online@
A knowledgeable Jordanian source revealed today (Thursday) that the Public Prosecution has begun summoning individuals this week who are concealing the assets of the banned terrorist group, the Muslim Brotherhood, according to what was reported by the Jordan News Agency (Petra).
The agency clarified that the committee for dissolving the group, affiliated with the Ministry of Social Development, had called on anyone concealing the group's assets to settle their situations for a month (which ended on June 14 of last year) before referring the case to the judiciary.
The agency quoted the informed source as saying: Several individuals approached the dissolution committee with declarations stating that they do not own movable or immovable assets, and they admitted that they are holding them for the group. The settlement has been made, and the assets have been transferred to the Association Support Fund under the Ministry of Social Development in accordance with the provisions of Article 25 of the applicable Associations Law. The source indicated that partners in land and property shares have acknowledged that they are not the original owners, but rather held them at the request of the banned group, while some partners stubbornly refused to acknowledge this and insisted on their ownership of the assets (properties and lands).
The source explained that signatories on a joint bank account in one of the governorates acknowledged that the funds they were holding do not belong to them, but rather to the banned group, and those funds have been transferred to the Association Support Fund in accordance with legal procedures.
The agency pointed out that anyone concealing the group's assets will expose themselves to legal accountability on charges of money laundering, breach of trust, and other charges if they refuse to acknowledge the truth after being confronted with evidence, including expertise and financial analysis. According to the law, any person holding ownership for another can avoid charges that may be brought against them by the Public Prosecution if they voluntarily relinquish and declare that they do not own the funds.
The agency clarified that the committee for dissolving the group, affiliated with the Ministry of Social Development, had called on anyone concealing the group's assets to settle their situations for a month (which ended on June 14 of last year) before referring the case to the judiciary.
The agency quoted the informed source as saying: Several individuals approached the dissolution committee with declarations stating that they do not own movable or immovable assets, and they admitted that they are holding them for the group. The settlement has been made, and the assets have been transferred to the Association Support Fund under the Ministry of Social Development in accordance with the provisions of Article 25 of the applicable Associations Law. The source indicated that partners in land and property shares have acknowledged that they are not the original owners, but rather held them at the request of the banned group, while some partners stubbornly refused to acknowledge this and insisted on their ownership of the assets (properties and lands).
The source explained that signatories on a joint bank account in one of the governorates acknowledged that the funds they were holding do not belong to them, but rather to the banned group, and those funds have been transferred to the Association Support Fund in accordance with legal procedures.
The agency pointed out that anyone concealing the group's assets will expose themselves to legal accountability on charges of money laundering, breach of trust, and other charges if they refuse to acknowledge the truth after being confronted with evidence, including expertise and financial analysis. According to the law, any person holding ownership for another can avoid charges that may be brought against them by the Public Prosecution if they voluntarily relinquish and declare that they do not own the funds.
