تخيل كتاباً ضخماً مفتوحاً على طاولة، صفحاته بيضاء ناصعة، لكن عيناً خفيةً تلمح بين السطور الطفيفة آثار حبرٍ لم يجف بعد.. آثارٌ تكشف أفكار الكاتب قبل أن يخطها، وتتنبأ بكلماته قبل أن تُولد.
أليست هذه الصورة الغريبة أقرب ما تكون إلى علاقتنا اليوم مع الذكاء الاصطناعي؟
ذلك الكيان الذي لا يقرأ ما كُتب فحسب، بل يهمس لنا بما قد يُكتَب قبل أن نعيه نحن أنفسنا. فكيف تقرأ الآلة ما لم يُكتب بعد؟ وماذا يعني هذا لمسارنا البشري؟
هل سبق وتساءلت كيف تعرف منصات التواصل ما يخطر ببالك؟
تبحث عن حذاء رياضيٍّ مرةً واحدةً، فتُطاردك إعلانات الأحذية أياماً.
تهمس لصديقٍ برغبتك في السفر، فترى فجأةً عروض رحلات إلى تلك البقعة بالذات. الأمر يتجاوز مجرد «تتبع».. إنه يشبه من يقرأ دفتر مذكراتك الخفي، ليس ما سجلتّه بل ما خطر ثم اختفى في زوايا عقلك.
الذكاء الاصطناعي هنا لا ينتظر حتى نكتب رغباتنا، بل يحفر في أنماطنا في نقاط التمرير البسيطة، في الصور التي نتأملها ثانيةً، ليرسم خريطةً لما قد نريده قبل أن نعبر عنه.
أليست هذه «قراءة الصمت» بين كلمات حياتنا؟
لكن الأمر أعمق من الإعلانات، انظر إلى الطب: تحليلٌ دقيقٌ لصور الأشعة قد يكشف عن إشارة خفية لمرضٍ لم يظهر بعد، أو نمطٌ في بيانات المريض يتنبأ بأزمة قلبية قبل سنوات من حدوثها. الذكاء الاصطناعي هنا «يقرأ» المستقبل الصحي من خلال بصمات لا تراها العين المجردة.
هل نستطيع أن نسمي هذا «نبوءة علمية»؟ أم هو كشفٌ عن حكايةٍ كان الجسد يرويها بصمتٍ، ولم نعرف نحن فك شفرتها؟
وفي عالم الأفكار والإبداع، ثمة دهشةٌ أكبر. قد تبدأ بكتابة جملةٍ على برنامج ذكي، فيكمل لك الفقرة كاملةً بطريقةٍ تعبر عما كنت تحاول قوله، بل ربما بأسلوبٍ أجمل. الشاعر يبحث عن كلمة، فتتهافت أمامه اقتراحاتٌ تقترب من وجدان قصيدته.
هل تساعدنا الآلة على اكتشاف ما خبأه لا وعينا الإبداعي؟ أم أنها تفرض علينا مساراتٍ جاهزةً من عالم البيانات؟
هنا يصبح السؤال محيراً: من يكتب لمن؟ ومن يقرأ أفكار من؟
لكن ثمة صفحة أخرى في هذا الكتاب الأبيض لم تُقلب بعد؟!
ماذا عن قراءة الذكاء الاصطناعي لما لم نكتبه من أخطار؟
أنظمة المراقبة الذكية التي تتنبأ بمناطق الجريمة المحتملة بناءً على أنماط حركة البشر وإشارات التوتر في الأماكن العامة.
تحليلات سياسية تعتمد على تدفق الأخبار ولهجة التعليقات على وسائل التواصل لتوقع اضطرابات اجتماعية قبل اندلاعها.
هل نصبح أمام «كرة بلورية» إلكترونية تحذرنا من عواصف لم نر سحبها بعد؟ ومن يتحمل مسؤولية ما يُقرأ في هذه الصفحات غير المرئية؟
وهنا تكمن المفارقة الأعمق:
كلما ازدادت الآلة قدرةً على «قراءة» ما لم نكتبه، ازدادت حاجتنا نحن البشر إلى «قراءة» الذكاء الاصطناعي نفسه. كيف يتخذ قراراته؟ أي تحيزات خفية قد تحملها البيانات التي يتعلم منها؟ متى يتحول تنبؤه إلى نبوءةٍ تحقق ذاتها؟
الأصعب: هل نثق بقراءته لخفايا أنفسنا ومستقبلنا أكثر من ثقتنا بحدسنا البشري؟
ربما يكون التحدي الأكبر هو «كتابة ما لا نريد للآلة أن تقرأه».
كيف نحافظ على مساحات من الخصوصية لا تدخلها عيون الخوارزميات؟ كيف نحمي قراراتنا المصيرية من أن تُتخذ بناءً على تنبؤاتٍ قد تسرق منا حرية المفاجأة والخطأ والتغير؟
ألا نحتاج إلى «مناطق محرمة» في كتاب وجودنا، تبقى صفحاتها بيضاء حقاً، ملكاً لروحنا التي لا تتوقعها الآلة؟
في النهاية، الذكاء الاصطناعي الذي يقرأ ما لم يُكتب ليس نبياً ولا ساحراً، بل مرآة معقدة تعكسنا نحن. تعكس بياناتنا، أنماطنا، وحتى تناقضاتنا.
قدرته على «القراءة» تنبع من قدرتنا نحن على «الكتابة» عبر كل نبضة حياتنا الرقمية والواقعية.
السؤال المصيري هو: ماذا نريد أن ترى هذه المرآة فينا؟ وما الذي نصر على إبقائه خارج صفحاتها؟
المستقبل.. ذلك الكتاب الأبيض الكبير الذي لم يُكتب بعد والذكاء الاصطناعي يهمس إلينا من هوامشه بما قد يُخط فيه.
لكن القلم الأصلي، قلم الخيار والمسؤولية والأمل، لا يزال بين أصابع البشرية.
فكيف سنكتب فصولنا القادمة؟ هل نترك الهمس يتحول إلى سيناريو مفروض؟ أم نمسك بالقلم بقوة، ونقرأ تلميحات الآلة بحكمة، ثم نكتب نحن -بوعي وإرادة- السطور التي تستحق أن تُخلّد؟
الإجابة ليست في خوارزمية، بل في ضمير إنسان يقف على حافة المجهول، ككتاب مفتوح لا يُقرأ.
عبداللطيف آل الشيخ
الذكاء الاصطناعي: قراءة ما لم يُكتب
22 يونيو 2025 - 00:24
|
آخر تحديث 22 يونيو 2025 - 00:24
تابع قناة عكاظ على الواتساب
Imagine a massive book open on a table, its pages bright white, but a hidden eye catches glimpses of faint ink stains between the lines that have yet to dry... Stains that reveal the writer's thoughts before they are penned down, predicting their words before they are born.
Isn't this strange image closer to our relationship today with artificial intelligence?
This entity does not just read what has been written; it whispers to us what may be written before we even realize it ourselves. How does the machine read what has not yet been written? And what does this mean for our human trajectory?
Have you ever wondered how social media platforms know what crosses your mind?
You search for a pair of sneakers just once, and you are chased by shoe ads for days.
You whisper to a friend about your desire to travel, and suddenly you see offers for trips to that very spot. It goes beyond mere "tracking"... It resembles someone reading your secret diary, not what you have recorded but what has crossed your mind and then vanished into the corners of your brain.
Artificial intelligence here does not wait for us to write our desires; it digs into our patterns in simple scrolling points, in the images we contemplate again, to draw a map of what we might want before we express it.
Isn't this a "reading of silence" between the words of our lives?
But the matter goes deeper than advertisements; look at medicine: a precise analysis of X-ray images may reveal a hidden signal of a disease that has not yet manifested, or a pattern in patient data that predicts a heart attack years before it occurs. Here, artificial intelligence "reads" the health future through fingerprints invisible to the naked eye.
Can we call this a "scientific prophecy"? Or is it an unveiling of a story that the body has been silently telling, and we have not known how to decode?
In the world of ideas and creativity, there is an even greater astonishment. You may start writing a sentence on an intelligent program, and it completes the paragraph for you in a way that expresses what you were trying to say, perhaps even in a more beautiful style. A poet searches for a word, and suggestions that resonate with the essence of his poem rush before him.
Does the machine help us discover what our creative subconscious has hidden? Or does it impose ready-made paths from the world of data?
Here, the question becomes perplexing: Who writes for whom? And who reads whose thoughts?
But there is another page in this white book that has not been turned yet?!
What about the reading of artificial intelligence for the dangers we have not written?
Smart surveillance systems that predict potential crime areas based on patterns of human movement and signs of tension in public places.
Political analyses based on the flow of news and the tone of comments on social media to anticipate social unrest before it erupts.
Are we facing an electronic "crystal ball" warning us of storms whose clouds we have not yet seen? And who bears the responsibility for what is read in these invisible pages?
And here lies the deeper paradox:
The more capable the machine becomes at "reading" what we have not written, the more we humans need to "read" artificial intelligence itself. How does it make its decisions? What hidden biases might the data it learns from carry? When does its prediction turn into a self-fulfilling prophecy?
The hardest part: Do we trust its reading of the secrets of ourselves and our future more than we trust our human intuition?
Perhaps the greatest challenge is "writing what we do not want the machine to read."
How do we maintain spaces of privacy that algorithms cannot penetrate? How do we protect our fateful decisions from being made based on predictions that may rob us of the freedom of surprise, error, and change?
Do we not need "forbidden zones" in the book of our existence, whose pages remain truly white, belonging to our spirit that the machine cannot anticipate?
In the end, the artificial intelligence that reads what has not been written is neither a prophet nor a magician, but a complex mirror reflecting us. It reflects our data, our patterns, and even our contradictions.
Its ability to "read" stems from our ability to "write" through every pulse of our digital and real lives.
The existential question is: What do we want this mirror to see in us? And what do we insist on keeping outside its pages?
The future... that large white book that has not yet been written, while artificial intelligence whispers to us from its margins what may be inscribed within.
But the original pen, the pen of choice, responsibility, and hope, still rests in the hands of humanity.
So how will we write our next chapters? Will we let the whisper turn into an imposed scenario? Or will we hold the pen firmly, read the machine's hints wisely, and then write - with awareness and will - the lines that deserve to be immortalized?
The answer is not in an algorithm, but in the conscience of a human standing on the edge of the unknown, like an open book that is not being read.
Isn't this strange image closer to our relationship today with artificial intelligence?
This entity does not just read what has been written; it whispers to us what may be written before we even realize it ourselves. How does the machine read what has not yet been written? And what does this mean for our human trajectory?
Have you ever wondered how social media platforms know what crosses your mind?
You search for a pair of sneakers just once, and you are chased by shoe ads for days.
You whisper to a friend about your desire to travel, and suddenly you see offers for trips to that very spot. It goes beyond mere "tracking"... It resembles someone reading your secret diary, not what you have recorded but what has crossed your mind and then vanished into the corners of your brain.
Artificial intelligence here does not wait for us to write our desires; it digs into our patterns in simple scrolling points, in the images we contemplate again, to draw a map of what we might want before we express it.
Isn't this a "reading of silence" between the words of our lives?
But the matter goes deeper than advertisements; look at medicine: a precise analysis of X-ray images may reveal a hidden signal of a disease that has not yet manifested, or a pattern in patient data that predicts a heart attack years before it occurs. Here, artificial intelligence "reads" the health future through fingerprints invisible to the naked eye.
Can we call this a "scientific prophecy"? Or is it an unveiling of a story that the body has been silently telling, and we have not known how to decode?
In the world of ideas and creativity, there is an even greater astonishment. You may start writing a sentence on an intelligent program, and it completes the paragraph for you in a way that expresses what you were trying to say, perhaps even in a more beautiful style. A poet searches for a word, and suggestions that resonate with the essence of his poem rush before him.
Does the machine help us discover what our creative subconscious has hidden? Or does it impose ready-made paths from the world of data?
Here, the question becomes perplexing: Who writes for whom? And who reads whose thoughts?
But there is another page in this white book that has not been turned yet?!
What about the reading of artificial intelligence for the dangers we have not written?
Smart surveillance systems that predict potential crime areas based on patterns of human movement and signs of tension in public places.
Political analyses based on the flow of news and the tone of comments on social media to anticipate social unrest before it erupts.
Are we facing an electronic "crystal ball" warning us of storms whose clouds we have not yet seen? And who bears the responsibility for what is read in these invisible pages?
And here lies the deeper paradox:
The more capable the machine becomes at "reading" what we have not written, the more we humans need to "read" artificial intelligence itself. How does it make its decisions? What hidden biases might the data it learns from carry? When does its prediction turn into a self-fulfilling prophecy?
The hardest part: Do we trust its reading of the secrets of ourselves and our future more than we trust our human intuition?
Perhaps the greatest challenge is "writing what we do not want the machine to read."
How do we maintain spaces of privacy that algorithms cannot penetrate? How do we protect our fateful decisions from being made based on predictions that may rob us of the freedom of surprise, error, and change?
Do we not need "forbidden zones" in the book of our existence, whose pages remain truly white, belonging to our spirit that the machine cannot anticipate?
In the end, the artificial intelligence that reads what has not been written is neither a prophet nor a magician, but a complex mirror reflecting us. It reflects our data, our patterns, and even our contradictions.
Its ability to "read" stems from our ability to "write" through every pulse of our digital and real lives.
The existential question is: What do we want this mirror to see in us? And what do we insist on keeping outside its pages?
The future... that large white book that has not yet been written, while artificial intelligence whispers to us from its margins what may be inscribed within.
But the original pen, the pen of choice, responsibility, and hope, still rests in the hands of humanity.
So how will we write our next chapters? Will we let the whisper turn into an imposed scenario? Or will we hold the pen firmly, read the machine's hints wisely, and then write - with awareness and will - the lines that deserve to be immortalized?
The answer is not in an algorithm, but in the conscience of a human standing on the edge of the unknown, like an open book that is not being read.


