الحرب تغيّر قواعد الاقتصاد!

The global economy did not enter 2026 prepared for a major crisis. On the contrary, expectations leaned towards cautious optimism; relatively stable growth, a gradual recovery from previous disruptions, and clear resilience in the performance of the private sector, but this trajectory did not last long. Suddenly, the war reshaped the entire landscape as a turning point that revealed the fragility of assumptions that had settled for decades.

The traditional characterization of what happened as an "external shock" does not reflect the depth of the change. Even the analyses of the International Monetary Fund, despite their accuracy in describing the impact, still tend to treat the crisis within a familiar economic framework, but reality indicates a deeper transformation. The global economy has begun to be shaped under the pressure of geopolitical factors, moving away from traditional economic cycles.

Over the past decades, economic fluctuations could be explained through clear tools such as demand, supply, monetary policy, and government spending. Today, these tools are no longer sufficient. For example, energy prices have transcended the idea of production or consumption levels, becoming a mirror of the level of risks in strategic corridors, regional tensions, and the likelihood of disruptions. From this perspective, supply chains have moved beyond operational efficiency to become an element in the equation of national security.

Here lies the paradox; economic policies have not evolved at the same pace as reality has changed. Raising interest rates, the traditional tool recognized for curbing inflation, remains limited in impact when inflation is driven by geopolitical factors such as supply disruptions or rising transportation and insurance costs. Conversely, expanding government spending to support growth may end up fueling inflationary pressures rather than alleviating them. This paradox presents decision-makers with a complex equation involving familiar tools in a context that is no longer fully applicable to them.

In this context, it cannot be ignored that major crises always redistribute the balance of power, and the current war is no exception. Energy-exporting countries find themselves in a stronger position that goes beyond the financial aspect, touching on the strategic side as well. In contrast, importing countries face compounded pressures in terms of rising energy costs, eroding purchasing power, and challenges in the balance of payments. Emerging markets stand in a more vulnerable position, where external pressures intersect with limited response tools.

In light of this reality, reliance on traditional "forecasts" becomes less useful. The world is moving towards a scenario-based logic, where policies and strategies are built on multiple probabilities. This shift reflects an increasing awareness that uncertainty has become entrenched as a permanent feature in the serious economic system, and here we face a transformation in the rules of the game as the global economy shifts from a model based on efficiency and cost to one that places flexibility and security at the heart of its priorities. Globalization itself is not retreating as much as it is being reshaped, becoming more selective and more linked to considerations of sovereignty and stability.