يقول محمد إلهامي عضو تنظيم الإخوان المسلمين إنه يرحّب بعودة إسرائيل لاحتلال سيناء، مكملاً أنه على المدى البعيد فإن الاحتلال مفيد جداً لهم. ما قاله إلهامي؛ عكس المنطق الإنساني العاقل الذي يقول: «ابني على ما تحرره من أرض لتنتقل إلى أرض جديدة»، لكن موقف التنظيمات الإسلاموية وحليفاتها الثورية -الدائم- هو إبقاء الصراع قائماً لأنهم لا ينظرون للجزئيات الجغرافية إلا نظرة مصلحية، فمحمود الزهار القيادي في حماس يقول إن فلسطين ليست سوى مسواك صغير في المشروع الأممي الذي يسعون إليه.
إلهامي لا يعبّر عن غضب شخصي من وصول غزة إلى انسداد سياسي وإنساني، بل عن قناعات راسخة لدى التنظيمات الإسلاموية، تقول: بأن استدعاء الصدام مع القوى العظمى أو الأكبر قوة منها؛ هو مفتاح التمكين ضد الشعوب وليس المحتل، فعلها أسامة بن لادن والملا عمر مع أمريكا، وكذلك صدام حسين مع أمريكا مرتين، والقذافي مع فرنسا وأمريكا والناتو..
وهنا يبرز سؤال هل انتصروا؟ هل تحوّل الصدام إلى محرك للانتصارات.. بالطبع لا، العراق في خراب كبير، وليبيا دولة منقسمة، وأفغانستان تعيش على هامش التاريخ، ولبنان دولة تراوح مكانها بلا تنمية ولا أرصدة بنكية.
اليوم يحاول حزب الله في لبنان من جهة، وتنظيم الإخوان العالمي وحلفاؤه من جهة موازية، استدعاء الاحتلال الإسرائيلي إلى الأراضي التي انسحبت منها ذات يوم.
هذه القوى تفضّل عودة الاحتلال الإسرائيلي مرة أخرى بدلاً من الانخراط في المسار السياسي، خاصة بعدما أصيبوا في مقتل؛ إثر هدم معبدهم الكبير بمن فيه، من سقوط حماس، والجهاد في غزة، وحزب الله في لبنان، ونظام بشار الأسد في سورية.
تلك القناعة التي استدعوها من عقيدة «صدام الصائل»، تقول: إن العودة إلى الصفر والبدء من مقاومة الاحتلال أفضل من التسليم بالهزيمة والإقرار بفشل مشروع الممانعة الذي قادوه منذ أربعة عقود، وإن استعادة مكانة الأحزاب والتنظيمات المنخرطة فيما يسمى محور المقاومة، هي من خلال إعادة تسويقها كتنظيمات تريد تحرير الأراضي المحتلة؟ وهي نظرية تشبه إعادة تدوير النفايات ولكن هذه المرة من خلال إعادة تدوير الصدام العسكري مع الاحتلال.
فلا حماس قادرة على الانتصار رغم كل المسكّنات التي تطلقها كل بضعة أشهر، ونظريتها التي سوّقتها طوال ثلاث سنوات مضت؛ سقطت وما عادت تقنع أكثر المخلصين لها.
حزب الله وحماس وكل تيار الممانعة أمام خيارين صعبين: التخلي عن غزة والضاحية بكل رمزيتها، وهذا يعني خروجهم من المشهد السياسي الأممي الذي كانوا يمثّلون رأس الحربة فيه وخصوصاً حماس، والثاني الاستسلام للواقع السياسي الجديد، وهذا يعني حتماً هزيمة المشروع الأممي الإسلاموي الذي اعتمد عليهم في تسويق نفسه.
لذلك يأتي استدعاء إسرائيل لإعادة احتلال غزة وجنوب لبنان كحل ثالث؛
وهو في نهاية الأمر «غسيل دم سياسي» لحماس وحزب الله من كل الآلام التي تسبّبوا فيها، إذ لأول مرة في التاريخ البشري تدفع حركة تدعي أنها حركة مقاومة عدوها لاحتلال أرضها مرة أخرى لكي تعود من نافذة مقاومته بعدما خرجت من باب رفاهية الحروب.
إذا حصل ذلك! عندها سيكون الاحتلال قُبلة الحياة التي تبحث عنها حماس وحزب الله وسط ركام غزة والضاحية وجنوب لبنان، وعندها يمكن إعادة «البربغندا» القائمة على تخوين الآخرين وتعظيم مكانة الممانعين.
هل تذكرون حزب الله وأدبياته التي سوّق بها نفسه أمام الشارع العربي، بحجة احتلال إسرائيل لجنوب لبنان، والتي بقي يرددها لثلاثة عقود، إلى أن خرجت إسرائيل من تلقاء نفسها.
نحن اليوم أمام نفس سيناريو 1982 عندما اندفعت الدبابات الإسرائيلية إلى جنوب لبنان ليستمر الاحتلال حتى العام 2000م، فهل سنرى قطاع غزة وقد ابتلعته الدبابات الإسرائيلية، ونشهد مرة أخرى تمركز قوات إسرائيلية في مناطق جنوب الليطاني اللبنانية.
نعم، ليس لدى الواعظ الإخواني محمد إلهامي ولا كل مرجعياته، ولا كل الكادر السياسي للإخوان، بما فيهم حماس، من عودة للمشهد إلا بعودة الاحتلال الإسرائيلي، وهدم الدول الوطنية، هم يرون أن توليد الثورات من الداخل يحتاج إلى صدام مع محتل من الخارج.
ومع كل شبر يتم احتلاله يعود رصيد تنظيمات الإسلام السياسي والعسكري والمالي، وستعود المزايدات والاتهامات والتخوينات وتعبئة المجتمعات ضد حكوماتها، ولن يسأل أحد نفسه من تسبّب في عودة الاحتلال لأراضٍ محررة أصلاً.
تابع قناة عكاظ على الواتساب
Mohamed Elhami, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, says he welcomes Israel's return to occupy Sinai, adding that in the long run, the occupation is very beneficial for them. What Elhami said contradicts the rational human logic that states: "Build on what you liberate from land to move to new land," but the position of Islamist organizations and their revolutionary allies is to keep the conflict ongoing because they view geographical details only through a utilitarian lens. Mahmoud al-Zahar, a leader in Hamas, says that Palestine is nothing but a small toothpick in the international project they are pursuing.
Elhami does not express personal anger over Gaza's political and humanitarian deadlock, but rather reflects the deep-seated convictions of Islamist organizations, which assert that invoking confrontation with the great powers or those stronger than them is the key to empowerment against peoples, not the occupier. Osama bin Laden and Mullah Omar did it with America, as did Saddam Hussein with America twice, and Gaddafi with France, America, and NATO...
Here arises the question: Did they win? Did the confrontation turn into a driver for victories? Of course not; Iraq is in great ruin, Libya is a divided state, Afghanistan lives on the margins of history, and Lebanon is a country that remains stagnant with no development or bank assets.
Today, Hezbollah in Lebanon, on one hand, and the global Muslim Brotherhood and its allies on a parallel front, are trying to invoke the Israeli occupation of the lands from which it once withdrew.
These forces prefer the return of the Israeli occupation rather than engaging in the political process, especially after they suffered a severe blow due to the destruction of their great temple along with its occupants, following the fall of Hamas, Jihad in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Bashar al-Assad's regime in Syria.
This conviction they have summoned from the doctrine of "the aggressor's confrontation" states that returning to zero and starting from resisting the occupation is better than conceding defeat and acknowledging the failure of the resistance project they have led for four decades. They believe that restoring the status of the parties and organizations involved in what is called the axis of resistance is through re-marketing them as organizations that want to liberate the occupied lands. This theory resembles recycling waste, but this time through recycling military confrontation with the occupation.
Neither Hamas can achieve victory despite all the painkillers it releases every few months, nor can its theory, which it marketed for three years, convince even its most loyal supporters anymore.
Hezbollah, Hamas, and the entire resistance current face two difficult choices: to abandon Gaza and the southern suburbs with all their symbolism, which means their exit from the international political scene they represented at the forefront, especially Hamas, or to surrender to the new political reality, which inevitably means the defeat of the Islamist international project that relied on them to market itself.
Thus, the call for Israel to reoccupy Gaza and southern Lebanon comes as a third solution;
and ultimately, it is a "political blood wash" for Hamas and Hezbollah from all the pains they have caused, as for the first time in human history, a movement that claims to be a resistance movement pushes its enemy to occupy its land again to return through the window of its resistance after exiting through the door of the luxury of wars.
If that happens! Then the occupation will be the kiss of life that Hamas and Hezbollah seek amid the rubble of Gaza, the suburbs, and southern Lebanon, and then they can reintroduce the "propaganda" based on accusing others and glorifying the position of the resistors.
Do you remember Hezbollah and its literature that it marketed to itself before the Arab street, under the pretext of Israel's occupation of southern Lebanon, which it repeated for three decades until Israel withdrew on its own?
Today, we are facing the same scenario as 1982 when Israeli tanks surged into southern Lebanon, leading to an occupation that lasted until the year 2000. Will we see the Gaza Strip swallowed by Israeli tanks and witness once again the concentration of Israeli forces in southern Lebanese areas?
Yes, neither the Muslim Brotherhood preacher Mohamed Elhami nor all his references, nor the entire political cadre of the Brotherhood, including Hamas, see a return to the scene except with the return of the Israeli occupation and the destruction of national states. They believe that generating revolutions from within requires a confrontation with an external occupier.
With every inch occupied, the balance of political, military, and financial Islamist organizations returns, and the bidding, accusations, and treason will resume, mobilizing societies against their governments, and no one will ask themselves who caused the return of the occupation to lands that were already liberated.
Elhami does not express personal anger over Gaza's political and humanitarian deadlock, but rather reflects the deep-seated convictions of Islamist organizations, which assert that invoking confrontation with the great powers or those stronger than them is the key to empowerment against peoples, not the occupier. Osama bin Laden and Mullah Omar did it with America, as did Saddam Hussein with America twice, and Gaddafi with France, America, and NATO...
Here arises the question: Did they win? Did the confrontation turn into a driver for victories? Of course not; Iraq is in great ruin, Libya is a divided state, Afghanistan lives on the margins of history, and Lebanon is a country that remains stagnant with no development or bank assets.
Today, Hezbollah in Lebanon, on one hand, and the global Muslim Brotherhood and its allies on a parallel front, are trying to invoke the Israeli occupation of the lands from which it once withdrew.
These forces prefer the return of the Israeli occupation rather than engaging in the political process, especially after they suffered a severe blow due to the destruction of their great temple along with its occupants, following the fall of Hamas, Jihad in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Bashar al-Assad's regime in Syria.
This conviction they have summoned from the doctrine of "the aggressor's confrontation" states that returning to zero and starting from resisting the occupation is better than conceding defeat and acknowledging the failure of the resistance project they have led for four decades. They believe that restoring the status of the parties and organizations involved in what is called the axis of resistance is through re-marketing them as organizations that want to liberate the occupied lands. This theory resembles recycling waste, but this time through recycling military confrontation with the occupation.
Neither Hamas can achieve victory despite all the painkillers it releases every few months, nor can its theory, which it marketed for three years, convince even its most loyal supporters anymore.
Hezbollah, Hamas, and the entire resistance current face two difficult choices: to abandon Gaza and the southern suburbs with all their symbolism, which means their exit from the international political scene they represented at the forefront, especially Hamas, or to surrender to the new political reality, which inevitably means the defeat of the Islamist international project that relied on them to market itself.
Thus, the call for Israel to reoccupy Gaza and southern Lebanon comes as a third solution;
and ultimately, it is a "political blood wash" for Hamas and Hezbollah from all the pains they have caused, as for the first time in human history, a movement that claims to be a resistance movement pushes its enemy to occupy its land again to return through the window of its resistance after exiting through the door of the luxury of wars.
If that happens! Then the occupation will be the kiss of life that Hamas and Hezbollah seek amid the rubble of Gaza, the suburbs, and southern Lebanon, and then they can reintroduce the "propaganda" based on accusing others and glorifying the position of the resistors.
Do you remember Hezbollah and its literature that it marketed to itself before the Arab street, under the pretext of Israel's occupation of southern Lebanon, which it repeated for three decades until Israel withdrew on its own?
Today, we are facing the same scenario as 1982 when Israeli tanks surged into southern Lebanon, leading to an occupation that lasted until the year 2000. Will we see the Gaza Strip swallowed by Israeli tanks and witness once again the concentration of Israeli forces in southern Lebanese areas?
Yes, neither the Muslim Brotherhood preacher Mohamed Elhami nor all his references, nor the entire political cadre of the Brotherhood, including Hamas, see a return to the scene except with the return of the Israeli occupation and the destruction of national states. They believe that generating revolutions from within requires a confrontation with an external occupier.
With every inch occupied, the balance of political, military, and financial Islamist organizations returns, and the bidding, accusations, and treason will resume, mobilizing societies against their governments, and no one will ask themselves who caused the return of the occupation to lands that were already liberated.
